Defining the state [itex]| \alpha > [/itex] such that:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]| \alpha > = Ce^{\alpha {\hat{a}}^{\dagger}} | 0 >\ ,\ C \in \mathbf{R};\ \alpha \in \mathbf{C};[/tex]

Now, [itex]| \alpha >[/itex] is an eigenstate of the lowering operator [itex]\hat{a}[/itex], isn't it?

In other words, the statement that [itex] \hat{a} | \alpha >\ =\ \alpha | \alpha > [/itex] is true, right?

(for the eigenvalue [itex]\alpha[/itex]?)

Is that the correct use of the Dirac notation?

How might one go about proving the above?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Harmonic Oscillator, Ladder Operators, and Dirac notation

Loading...

Similar Threads - Harmonic Oscillator Ladder | Date |
---|---|

I Harmonic oscillator ladder operators | Dec 2, 2016 |

Ladder operators to find Hamiltonian of harmonic oscillator | Mar 4, 2015 |

Ladder operator for harmonic oscillator, I don't get a mathematical | Jun 6, 2013 |

Quantum Harmonic Oscillator - Why we limit the bottom end of the ladder | Dec 11, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**