Harmonic Oscillator & Schrodinger

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancies between two references regarding the normalized harmonic oscillator wavefunction. The first reference from Oxford presents the equation without the term (alpha/pi)^(1/4), while the second reference from HyperPhysics includes it. The definitions of the variable y differ between the two sources, with the first defining y as y = sqrt(m*omega/hbar)*x and the second as y = sqrt(alpha)*x, where alpha = (m*omega)/hbar. The confusion arises from the different definitions of omega, which may affect the final form of the equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, specifically harmonic oscillators.
  • Familiarity with wavefunctions and their normalization.
  • Knowledge of the Hermite polynomial functions used in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of the relationship between frequency and angular frequency (omega).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the normalized harmonic oscillator wavefunction in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the properties and applications of Hermite polynomials in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the relationship between frequency and angular frequency, particularly in the context of oscillatory systems.
  • Examine the implications of different normalization constants in quantum wavefunctions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to harmonic oscillators and wavefunctions.

bluestar
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I wish to graph a couple of the waveforms of a harmonic oscillator. I have consulted several resources and have found two that I like but the final equation differs even though they are both labeled normalized harmonic oscillator wavefunction.

The first reference explains how the harmonic oscillator function is determined and the harmonic equation is at the very bottom of this 3 page document.
http://physchem.ox.ac.uk/~hill/tutorials/qm2_tutorial/sho_series.pdf

The second reference only presents the harmonic equation after a very brief discussion and it too is at the bottom of a 1 page display.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hosc2.html#c1

The difference is the first term after the equate which is: (alpha/pi)^1/4.
This term does not appear in the first reference but does appear in the second.

Also the constants just before the Hermite function differ.


Does anybody know why there is a difference between these two equations and how the difference occurred?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Their definitions of y are slightly different, this is where you are getting confused.
 
It would appear the definitions of y are the same; however, omega differs.

Reference 1 defines y as

y = sqrt(m*omega/hbar)*x where omega = sqrt(k/m)
This is at equation (2)

The reference 2 defines y as:

y = sqrt(alpha)*x where alpha = (m*omega)/hbar and omega = sqrt(k/m) OR omega = 2pi
This definition occurs just above the harmonic equation at the bottom of the page and omega definition at the top of the page.

I can not tell which definition for omega was used. I suspect that since pi occurs in the final form that omega was defined as 2pi * (frequency?).

Thus are the two omegas equal? Gut feeling thinks not.
sqrt(k/m) = 2*pi*(frequency?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K