Harmonic Oscillator: When Will Body Return to Initial Place?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a harmonic oscillator problem involving a body of mass 4 kg subjected to a restoring force defined by F = -3(x-6). The initial kinetic energy is given as 2.16 J, and the potential energy at the same instant is 0.96 J. The main question posed is about determining when the body will return to its initial position at time t=0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of angular frequency and its relation to the period of oscillation. There are questions about the correct interpretation of the problem, specifically whether it asks for the period or the time when the body returns to its initial position. Some participants suggest plotting the function to visualize the solution.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem, with participants providing insights into the calculations and interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct notation and the importance of the phase angle in the calculations. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answer yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the notation used for position and the implications of the initial conditions, particularly the decreasing kinetic energy. There is also mention of constraints related to the context of an exam question, where computational tools may not be allowed.

PhMichael
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A body of mass 4[kgr] is moving along the x-axis while the following force is applied on it:

[tex]F= -3(x-6)[/tex]

We know that at time t=0 the kinetic energy is [tex]K=2.16[J][/tex] and that its decreasing, that is, [tex]\frac{dK}{dt}<0[/tex].
The potential energy (with respect to the equilibrium point) at that same instant is: [tex]V=0.96[J][/tex]

When will this body return to its initial point (i.e. the position at t=0)?

2. The attempt at a solution

The initial position of the body with respect to the equilibrium point (x=6) is found from the P.E. expression, as the "spring" constant is k=3. So:

[tex]V=0.5kx^{2} \to x= \pm 0.8[/tex]

Now, we find the position of the body with respect to time. The amplitude is found from energy conservation between the initial state and when the body is at a maximum distance from equilibrium (K=0), so that:

[tex]K(t=0)+V(t=0) = 0.5kA^{2} \to A=1.442[/tex]

So,

[tex]x(t) = 1.442cos(\omega t + \phi)[/tex] where [tex]\omega^{2}=k/m=0.75[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] is found from the initial position of the body: [tex]x= \pm 0.8[/tex]

for the +0.8 we get after substitution: [tex]\phi = 56.3^{o}[/tex]

for the -0.8 we get after substitution: [tex]\phi = 33.7^{o}[/tex]

The data of [tex]\frac{dK}{dt} < 0[/tex] means that the body is drawing away from the initial position, so had it been in x=+0.8 then it moves to the right and had it been in in x=-0.8 then it moves to the left.

So I have everything I need to know about this oscillator. My question: What is the condition I need in order to answer what is required, i.e., the condition of the return of the body to its initial place?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First off ω is not k/m. The correct expression is ω2 = k/m. If you find the correct ω the rest is easy because this problem has a lot of red herrings. You are essentially asked to find the period of oscillations. How is that related to ω?
 
kuruman said:
First off ω is not k/m. The correct expression is ω2 = k/m. If you find the correct ω the rest is easy because this problem has a lot of red herrings. You are essentially asked to find the period of oscillations. How is that related to ω?

It was just a typo :wink: ... the angular frequency is of course: [tex]\omega = \sqrt{3}/2[/tex]

and no, it's not the period of oscillations which is [tex]T=2\pi/\omega=7.26 [sec][/tex] because the correct answer is:

[tex]t = 2.27[sec][/tex]
 
You're being a bit sloppy with your notation, using x to stand for two different quantities. You should have really solved

[tex]V_0=\frac{1}{2}k(x_0-6)^2[/tex]

and your solution x(t) should be

[tex]x(t)=6+1.442\cos(\omega t+\phi)[/tex]

How exactly was the question worded? Does it essentially ask for the period or does it ask for t when x(t)=x(0)? It'll pass through the same point but going in the opposite direction on the way back to the equilibrium point. If it's the latter interpretation, it might help you to look at a graph of x(t) to see how to go about solving the problem.
 
vela said:
You're being a bit sloppy with your notation, using x to stand for two different quantities. You should have really solved

[tex]V_0=\frac{1}{2}k(x_0-6)^2[/tex]

and your solution x(t) should be

[tex]x(t)=6+1.442\cos(\omega t+\phi)[/tex]

How exactly was the question worded? Does it essentially ask for the period or does it ask for t when x(t)=x(0)? It'll pass through the same point but going in the opposite direction on the way back to the equilibrium point. If it's the latter interpretation, it might help you to look at a graph of x(t) to see how to go about solving the problem.

I took my "zero" to be at the equilibrium point so I don't have to account for that "6", as far as I know.

I haven't cut off anything from the original wording: How much time will elapse until the body returns back to its initial position (the position at t=0)?
 
PhMichael said:
I took my "zero" to be at the equilibrium point so I don't have to account for that "6", as far as I know.
Yeah, I know what you were doing and that you understand what's going on. It's just a matter of expressing yourself precisely. You're given what x represents when the problem tells you F=-3(x-6). If you want to talk about the deviation from x=6, you should use a different variable, like δx.
I haven't cut off anything from the original wording: How much time will elapse until the body returns back to its initial position (the position at t=0)?
I'll just repeat my suggestion you plot δx as a function of time and see where it's equal to 0.8. That should suggest to you how to solve the problem if you don't already see it.
 
Well yeah, I have just plotted [rex]\delta x(t) [/tex] in MATLAB and got this answer by eveluating the relavent points in the graph, however, this is an exam question and I don't think computers were allowed to be used :wink: ...

Even when I equate [tex]x(t=0)=x(t)[/tex] I don't get the correct time :/
 
Can't say much without seeing your actual calculation.
 
PhMichael said:
I took my "zero" to be at the equilibrium point so I don't have to account for that "6", as far as I know.

I haven't cut off anything from the original wording: How much time will elapse until the body returns back to its initial position (the position at t=0)?

What value are you using for the initial phase? It is not zero here.
With the correct value of the phase, you'll get the time without plotting software.
I've got 2.27 s, by using only a pocket calculator.
 
  • #10
nasu said:
What value are you using for the initial phase? It is not zero here.
With the correct value of the phase, you'll get the time without plotting software.
I've got 2.27 s, by using only a pocket calculator.

I took it 56.3 degrees.

[tex]x(0)=x(t) \to 1.442cos(56.3)=1.442cos((\sqrt{3}/2)t+56.3)[/tex]

but this doesn't give me 2.27[sec] ...
 
  • #11
How exactly did you calculate the time? Don't describe or imply what you did in words. Show the exact calculation.
 
  • #12
I should convert this phase angle to radian [tex]\to 56.3^{o}=0.983[rad][/tex]

[tex]x(0)=x(t) \to 1.442cos(0.983)=1.442cos((\sqrt{3}/2)t+0.983) \to cos(0.983)=cos((\sqrt{3}/2)t+0.983) \to 0.983=\pm ((\sqrt{3}/2)t+0.983)[/tex]

we ignore the "+" possibility because it will give the initial time, i.e. t=0. So:

[tex]0.983=-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}t-0.983 \to 1.966=-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}t \to t=\left | \frac{1.966*2}{-\sqrt{3}} \right |=2.27 [sec][/tex]

Well, it appears that I've made it :hurray:
 
  • #13
by the way, is this solution what you meant or were you thinking of something else?
 
  • #14
You're close, but you got the sign on the phase angle wrong. I plotted your expression, and you can see that it has the body moving back toward the equilibrium point so that dK/dt>0, not dK/dt<0 as given. And x(t=2.27) is clearly not equal to x(t=0).

The fact you arbitrarily had to throw in an absolute value to get the correct answer should have tipped you off as well that something was amiss.
 

Attachments

  • plot.png
    plot.png
    2 KB · Views: 476
  • #15
Got ya! Thanks a lot :wink:
 
  • #16
PhMichael said:
I took it 56.3 degrees.

[tex]x(0)=x(t) \to 1.442cos(56.3)=1.442cos((\sqrt{3}/2)t+56.3)[/tex]

but this doesn't give me 2.27[sec] ...

The sign of the phase should be - .
Here is where you use the fact that KE is decreasing at t=0.

Sorry, I did not see the last post.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K