Harmonic Oscillators, a general conceptual question, help please understanding?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of coupled harmonic oscillators using an inclined air track setup with five masses and springs. Participants explore the meaning of 'coupling' in this context, defining it as the interaction between adjacent masses through springs. Key observations indicate that the amplitude of the lowest cart is greater due to its position as a free end, which affects energy transfer and propagation. The conversation also touches on energy conservation principles and questions regarding wave velocity in relation to string wave equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic oscillators and their dynamics
  • Familiarity with energy conservation principles in mechanical systems
  • Knowledge of wave propagation and velocity equations
  • Basic concepts of potential and kinetic energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical modeling of coupled harmonic oscillators
  • Study the effects of boundary conditions on wave propagation in mechanical systems
  • Explore the principles of energy transfer in coupled systems
  • Learn about the role of free and fixed ends in oscillatory motion
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying mechanics and wave phenomena, as well as researchers interested in the dynamics of coupled systems.

jcfor3ver
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
1)So I will describe my lab situation first, then ask my main questions. In my physics class we had an inclined air track, with 5 masses (carts) and 5 springs connected in between them. We turn on the air track to replicate a mostly 'frictionless' surface.

Now we did several trials writing down our observations and adding more masses to the carts and so forth.
My main question is what exactly does 'coupling' mean? I know we are looking at a coupled harmonic oscillation system. But as far as energy propagation through the system and wave velocity I do not know how to describe what I saw in these terms.
I'll add a little knowledge to what we saw. It seemed that the amplitude of the lowest elevated cart was the biggest. I know that energy propagation is transferred through the system because it seems like a very tiny 'wave' was passed through all the carts, and once it reached the end would turn around and comeback the other way.

3) My attempt at the solution is that since the track is elevated and at an inclines we are dealing with KE, Potential spring energy, and gravitational potential energy. I think the amplitude of the bottom cart is the smalled because it is not holding all of the masses like the top cart (which spring is attached to the end (or top) of the track) and therefore has the least grav pot energy. Which means that if energy is idealy conserved then it will have the most kinetic energy at the bottom. As far as wave velocity is concerned, would the wave velocity be the same equation as that of a wave along a string?

But I'll restate my main questions, how is energy being transferred/transformed? How is the energy being propagated? What does 'coupling' mean? And what would increase this 'coupling'? As far as wave velocity is concerned, would the wave velocity be the same equation as that of a wave along a string? I guess some other knowledge on coupled harmonic oscillators would be helpful too because I am just confused on this concept, and looking things up online hasn't helped me a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Coupling" means that adjacent masses exert a force on each other (because of the spring).

As for how energy is transferred/transformed or propagated, think about it this way: if the masses are initially at rest, and then you were to give a kick or jolt to start just one of them moving, what would soon happen to the other masses, and what physically causes that to happen?

I'm not quite sure what to make of the larger amplitude for the bottom mass. "Conservation of energy" applies to the total energy, added up for all the masses together. It doesn't say that each mass has the same energy as the others, so I wouldn't necessarily conclude that the one with the lowest potential must have the highest kinetic energy. Perhaps the fact that the lowest mass is a "free end" (as opposed to a fixed end) has something to do with it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
985
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K