Has String Theory Finally Unraveled the Mysteries of Black Holes?

Gavin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was working on black holes in Matrix theory about five years ago, but stopped to pursue other interests. I'm getting back into physics now and I'm trying to find out what I've missed. First I'd like to find out what happened to my favorite topic, black holes in string theory.

To this end, I was reading a nice interview with Lenny Susskind at "Edge":

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/susskind03/susskind_index.html

In it, Lenny says that the black hole problem is solved. He is pretty emphatic about this:

"There was an eruption of papers—mine, Joe Polchinski's, Andy Strominger's, Cumrun Vafa's—that really nailed that problem down. And black holes have been solved. Black holes have been understood. To this day the only real physics problem that has been solved by string theory is the problem of black holes. It led to some extremely revolutionary and strange ideas."

I've worked with Lenny in the past and know that he should be taken very seriously, but not always literally. Are them some review papers I can read that will catch me up on this solution, or is this mostly the same ideas that were around five years ago. Then we had a pretty good idea about what was going on, but we couldn't calculate the entropy of any realistic, astrophysical back hole. We could only find the entropy in special casses or at strage limit in higer dimensions.

I'll continue to look on my own, but combing through five years of hep-th arxiv is a pretty big task. I'd love to get some reading suggestions.

Gavin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Black Holes, Lubos style

:surprise:
Oops, forgot to recommend Lubos' paper:

Asymptotic black hole quasinormal frequencies
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0301173

He's on here to discuss questions, which is extremely convenient. :smile:
 
Thanks for the nice references. Hawking's talk has also helped me a lot -- not directly, but through the discussion it has generated.

Based on what I've been reading, it appears that the situation is not fundamentally different from five years ago, when people were coming to terms with the AdS/CFT correspondence. Some interesting stuff has been done, but there isn't any general calculation that gives the entropy yet.

Thanks,
Gavin
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
In LQG and LQC there are solutions called "black to white transition". I'll add some references: (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07251 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03872 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06330 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.04264 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12823 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02691 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07589 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01788 https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12646 https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03027...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...
Back
Top