Has the Tsunami Changed Our Pole Star?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vinee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pole Star
AI Thread Summary
The recent tsunami caused a minor change in the tilt of the Earth's axis, but it has not affected Polaris, the current Pole Star, which remains near the celestial pole. The Earth's axis experiences precession, causing it to wobble and trace a circular path over approximately 26,000 years, which will eventually lead to a different star becoming the Pole Star. This precession was known to ancient Greeks, indicating their ability to keep accurate astronomical records. The wobble is influenced by the gravitational pull of the Moon on Earth. Overall, while the tsunami had an effect, it is not significant enough to change our Pole Star.
vinee
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hey there, idunno if this has been discussed before.

there were a lot of articles abt a minor change in the tilt of the Earth's axis
becoz of the tsunami , does tht mean our pole star have also changed ?

any other noticeable effects of this ??

than x

vinee..
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi vinee welcome to these Forums!

The change to the Earth's axis is very small and has not affected Polaris, the Pole star, being near the celestial pole. It is about 10 away from it in any case.

However there is a precession of the Earth's axis, because it is wobbling like a spinning top, which means the Earth's celestial pole describes a circle on the celestial sphere that is 570 in diameter. However it takes about 26,000 years for the Earth to complete one ‘wobble’ and it is only noticed if you observe the position of the stars relative to the rotation of the Earth very carefully over a period of time. Eventually the North Celestial Pole will move away from Polaris and other star will have the distinction of being ‘the Pole Star’.

Nevertheless the ancient Greeks knew about this precession, which means they must have kept accurate records over a long time!

A spinning top wobbles because of the action of the Earth’s gravity; the Earth itself wobbles because of the action of the Moon’s gravity on it.

I hope this helps.

Garth
 
thanx a lot
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top