Have men been priced out of the dating market?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the evolving dynamics of dating and relationships, particularly the perceived value of men based on wealth and looks. It argues that historically, women married for economic security, but today, many women seek partners who are financially successful and attractive, leaving a significant number of men feeling undesirable. However, there are counterarguments emphasizing that personality, character, and the ability to make women feel valued are crucial in forming meaningful relationships, regardless of looks or income. Participants also highlight the limitations of online dating, suggesting it may not accurately reflect real-life dating scenarios. Ultimately, the conversation reveals a complex interplay between societal expectations, personal attributes, and dating success.
  • #101
zoobyshoe said:
A good story and one people here should pay attention to.

I see too many guys posting here with the certainty they're screwed vis a vis women because of some ridiculous preconception they've bought into about what all women want. I've personally broken all those barriers. I've had girlfriends taller than me, richer than me, better looking than me. Whatever criteria women say they have is always tentative, subject to change depending on actual overall "chemistry".

That's pretty much it, women love to have that option of changing their mind. Makes me really frustrated after I bought them the diamonds and now they want pearls!

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xij53e_prince-diamonds-and-pearls_people#.UbBio5rn_IU
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
MarneMath said:
I may never be able to buy my wife everything she ever dreamed of, but I did make ever piece of furniture in our house and to her the effort I put into try to get her to smile is worth more than that BMW that guy had.

awwww <3
 
  • #103
MarneMath said:
In the end, if you can make a girl happy, you'll find how quickly money drops in importance. I may never be able to buy my wife everything she ever dreamed of, but I did make ever piece of furniture in our house and to her the effort I put into try to get her to smile is worth more than that BMW that guy had.
Your wife sounds lucky to have you. :approve:
 
  • #104
In a sudden fit of enthusiasm, I got on a number of the more popular social/dating sites in my area. Anyone who has never done this before will find something quite telling. As a lower bound, there are 4 times as many ads from males than there are from females, and most of them seem like legit, real people. Almost all of the female ads are prostitute or scam ads. You'll find even worse statistics in random pair-up webcam chat rooms intended to meet people (certainly NSFW... I found out the hard way :S).

Oh, and well though this wasn't new to me, the biggest/oldest paid dating site in my part of the world (the equivalent of okcupid or similar) charges male members exclusively. Females pay no fees for contacting male members.
 
Last edited:
  • #105
WannabeNewton said:
I need to find a man with a BMW. Maybe I can get my college tuition paid off and also get the new xbox.

I found your mate right in my hometown:

http://www.datanta.es/user-view_user-141708.html

It's a Mercedes, but close enough!
 
  • #107
I have a pretty face, but I'm flat broke. You can't have everything in life.
 
  • #108
Lavabug said:
I have a pretty face, but I'm flat broke. You can't have everything in life.
That's not what my 2nd grade teacher told me; I can have everything I want, that's what the education system taught me!
 
  • #109
WannabeNewton said:
I can't see his face :frown: What if he isn't pretty :cry:

True beauty is on the inside...
 
  • #110
dirk_mec1 said:
True beauty is on the inside...

of his wallet!
 
  • #111
dirk_mec1 said:
True beauty is on the inside...
Boooo give me something I can actually work with man
 
  • #112
WannabeNewton said:
Boooo give me something I can actually work with man

Ok, how about this:

All (feminist) women in my environment tell other women: "You don't need a man to be happy, living your life to the fullest and be independent makes you happy!"
 
  • #113
Lavabug said:
I have a pretty face, but I'm flat broke. You can't have everything in life.

I retract the first statement, apparently 48 women on social dating sites concur I'm ugly! There goes what was left of my self-esteem... and my account. :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #114
dirk_mec1 said:
Ok, how about this:

All (feminist) women in my environment tell other women: "You don't need a man to be happy, living your life to the fullest and be independent makes you happy!"

Yeah, I think they're wrong about that. Considering the amount of time, resources and energy most people put into finding a life partner, and the number of studies out there that conclude that married people are happier than single people, I'd say that statement doesn't stand up to empirical verification.
 
  • #115
Lavabug said:
I retract the first statement, apparently 48 women on social dating sites concur I'm ugly! There goes what was left of my self-esteem... and my account. :P

No-no-no, please don't put any consideration to faceless, anonymous opinions on the innerwebs! We know you here, and we like you a lot :smile:.
 
  • #116
daveyrocket said:
Yeah, I think they're wrong about that. Considering the amount of time, resources and energy most people put into finding a life partner,
That time energy and resources is mostly spend by men...

and the number of studies out there that conclude that married people are happier than single people,
That does not mean that this holds for all pepole :)

I'd say that statement doesn't stand up to empirical verification.
Maybe somebody should make another paper regarding this subject.
 
  • #117
lisab said:
No-no-no, please don't put any consideration to faceless, anonymous opinions on the innerwebs! We know you here, and we like you a lot :smile:.
You say that lisa because you can't see his face on PF
 
  • #118
dirk_mec1 said:
You say that lisa because you can't see his face on PF

Absolutely. And the voters were definitely not faceless or anonymous!

I apologize for the cuss. :P
 
  • #119
Baby youuuuu're amaaziiiiing juuuuust the waaaaaaaaay you aaaaaaaaaaaaare
 
  • #121
Hmm, I don't agree to the OP. My first point being that not everyone equates marriage or even children, with the ideal bond. In fact, I'm not planning to get married for quite some time, until it becomes financial advantageous to do so. My boyfriend feels the same way. Being secular has it's benefits. We see it as a big hoopla about nothing.

I didn't accept my boyfriend's advances becuase he was attractive. He was the first guy I've ever met outside of other physics majors that when I said "I study physics" he was entirely honest. He said "I don't know much about physics, but if you listen to my talk of history, I'll listen to your talk of physics"

Rather than "Oh, I'm so sorry"

He's an okay looking guy, but he was unemployed for 2 years of our relationship. Did I leave, even though I'm an average female who could "find better"? Absolutely not. To me, a relationship is a friendship first and foremost. Sure you can love someone, but do you LIKE them. That's the real question.

Money doesn't make you more likable. Looks don't make you more likable. Those things make you more tolerable, more approachable--but at the end of the day, it's what's inside. If you can't be silly, talk for hours, hold one another and support one another, then what are you? And here's a newsflash, even "ugly" people can laugh and cry and smile.

I'm sorry about your difficulties in dating. But to make sweeping generalizations about the playing field with little more than anecdotal evidence and bias will get you no where.

Cheers
 
  • #122
To me, a relationship is a friendship first and foremost. Sure you can love someone, but do you LIKE them.
Random fact, my wife and I were married for over a year before she decided to like me. It took me nearly dying =(.
 
  • #123
HayleySarg said:
Hmm, I don't agree to the OP. My first point being that not everyone equates marriage or even children, with the ideal bond. In fact, I'm not planning to get married for quite some time, until it becomes financial advantageous to do so. My boyfriend feels the same way. Being secular has it's benefits. We see it as a big hoopla about nothing.

I didn't accept my boyfriend's advances becuase he was attractive. He was the first guy I've ever met outside of other physics majors that when I said "I study physics" he was entirely honest. He said "I don't know much about physics, but if you listen to my talk of history, I'll listen to your talk of physics"

Rather than "Oh, I'm so sorry"

He's an okay looking guy, but he was unemployed for 2 years of our relationship. Did I leave, even though I'm an average female who could "find better"? Absolutely not. To me, a relationship is a friendship first and foremost. Sure you can love someone, but do you LIKE them. That's the real question.

Money doesn't make you more likable. Looks don't make you more likable. Those things make you more tolerable, more approachable--but at the end of the day, it's what's inside. If you can't be silly, talk for hours, hold one another and support one another, then what are you? And here's a newsflash, even "ugly" people can laugh and cry and smile.

I'm sorry about your difficulties in dating. But to make sweeping generalizations about the playing field with little more than anecdotal evidence and bias will get you no where.

Cheers

It's more than just anecdotal. I posted a ref. to data supporting that people with higher income are more likely to marry--other people with high income-- than people with lower income, which are less-likely to marry (and, if/when they do marry they are much more likley to marry someone else of lower income).
 
Last edited:
  • #124
Perhaps the claim about being married specifically can be disputed. But I think it's hard to argue that people in long-term relationships are less happy than people who are alone:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23097143

Looks like I'm lacking in all of the things they point out.
 
  • #125
Hence why I specifically stated happiness doesn't correlate with marriage. Sure, lower income people are less lilkely to marry. Female professors are less likely to have children--are they miserable?

So what if you marry someone with a lower income? I don't really understand the issue.

All I see is that people with equal stats marry one another. It's unusual to find someone leaping many levels above their "league". I'm sure this has as much to do with physical appearance as it does lifestyle, social circle, and interests.
 
  • #126
If you put yourself on a path to success and display self-mastery, confidence, humor, and other positive traits you will begin attracting many more options. You're correct that good looks and financial status play a role, but this can be improved over time with proper diet, exercise, and education. Intelligence is also valued highly, use yours to improve your social skills, physical appearance, status etc in a way that is open and approachable and you will find yourself with no shortage of dates. Basically improve yourself and hustle.
 
  • #127
WannabeNewton said:
It's not only the feminists who would find your ramblings offensive but rather anyone who engages in rational thought.

This, pretty much.

Justify it however you want, OP, but there are plenty of middle to lower class men who end in relationships with beautiful women. It's just you.

Also, real life is much different than online dating, OP.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
11K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
9K
Replies
26
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top