Having trouble explaining this phenomena

  • Thread starter Thread starter charmedbeauty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phenomena
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment to verify Faraday's law by measuring the induced electromotive force (emf) when a magnet is dropped through coils. The original poster reports that connecting two coils in series resulted in the same induced emf as one coil, while connecting them in parallel resulted in half the induced emf compared to one coil. Participants are exploring the underlying physics of these observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the relationship between the configuration of coils (series vs. parallel) and the resulting induced emf. Some suggest that the number of loops in a coil might influence the emf, while others are considering the implications of the magnet's motion through the coils. There is also discussion about the average effect of the magnet passing through parallel coils.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing thoughts and hypotheses about the observed phenomena. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for simultaneous generation of emf in the coils, and there is recognition of the complexity involved in the experimental setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the physical arrangement of the coils and the timing of the magnet's passage through them. There is mention of using a voltmeter for measurement, and the potential for misunderstanding due to the sequential nature of the magnet's movement through the coils in series.

charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was doing an experiment to verify faraday's law

Where we were basically dropping a magnet through a coil and measuring the induced emf

Now here is the thing I can't explain;

we connected 2 coils in series and found the induced emf was the same as that of one coil

then we connected 2 coils in parallel and found that the induced emf was half that when using one coil.

How do you explain this... I thought it had something to do with the resistance but when I checked it using a bit of math for resistance in series and parallel I did not get a result like that from the experiment.

What is happening in terms of the physics here. Thanks



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
charmedbeauty said:

Homework Statement



I was doing an experiment to verify faraday's law

Where we were basically dropping a magnet through a coil and measuring the induced emf

Now here is the thing I can't explain;

we connected 2 coils in series and found the induced emf was the same as that of one coil

then we connected 2 coils in parallel and found that the induced emf was half that when using one coil.

How do you explain this... I thought it had something to do with the resistance but when I checked it using a bit of math for resistance in series and parallel I did not get a result like that from the experiment.

What is happening in terms of the physics here. Thanks



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Does it help to think that a single coil is a whole lot of loops joined in series, so to add a whole lot more loops in series should mean the same result - but given the physical size of the set-up, that emf may exist for a longer period of time.

Not sure of the parallel connection.
 
PeterO said:
Does it help to think that a single coil is a whole lot of loops joined in series, so to add a whole lot more loops in series should mean the same result - but given the physical size of the set-up, that emf may exist for a longer period of time.

Not sure of the parallel connection.

Yeah I kinda gathered that but I am more unsure of the parallel result... I just can't seem to figure it out.
 
charmedbeauty said:
Yeah I kinda gathered that but I am more unsure of the parallel result... I just can't seem to figure it out.

I wonder if the parallel situation is giving you an "average" result? The magnet can't be in both coils at once [unless one fits inside the other] so at each phase you are getting "emf+0"/2.

One might argue that a magnet falling through a coil effectively produces a power supply, like a battery.

What happens when you connect two similar batteries in Series?
What happens when you connect two similar batteries in parallel?
 
PeterO said:
I wonder if the parallel situation is giving you an "average" result? The magnet can't be in both coils at once [unless one fits inside the other] so at each phase you are getting "emf+0"/2.

One might argue that a magnet falling through a coil effectively produces a power supply, like a battery.

What happens when you connect two similar batteries in Series?
What happens when you connect two similar batteries in parallel?

Well in series the voltages would add and the current capacity would stay the same

in parallel it would be the opposite

so your saying that the ε ≈ dBA/dt


so for ε/2... BA stays the same but the time the battery spends falling through the loop approx. doubles since it is two loops.so N=2n/2l

Is this what your saying?

for the first case (series) it acts like this

2ε = dBA/2dt

thats why we had the same result.

second case (parallel)

ε = 2BA/2dt



?
 
charmedbeauty said:
Well in series the voltages would add and the current capacity would stay the same

in parallel it would be the opposite

so your saying that the ε ≈ dBA/dt


so for ε/2... BA stays the same but the time the battery spends falling through the loop approx. doubles since it is two loops.so N=2n/2l

Is this what your saying?

for the first case (series) it acts like this

2ε = dBA/2dt

thats why we had the same result.

second case (parallel)

ε = 2BA/2dt



?

I have never actually considered this situation before, so don't have a definitive answer - I merely put forward some thoughts to prod you along.

This last consideration where you refer to rate of change of flux looks promising.
 
PeterO said:
I have never actually considered this situation before, so don't have a definitive answer - I merely put forward some thoughts to prod you along.

This last consideration where you refer to rate of change of flux looks promising.

Ok thanks
 
charmedbeauty said:
then we connected 2 coils in parallel and found that the induced emf was half that when using one coil.
Can you explain how you went about this? How you dropped a magnet through two parallel coils simultaneously?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Can you explain how you went about this? How you dropped a magnet through two parallel coils simultaneously?

the coils were placed on top of each other so the length of the coil (x) is now 2x.

then we dropped the magnet through them so at some point I guess the magnet could have been in both coils at the same time since the length of the magnet was ≈x/2.

does this make sense.

??
 
  • #10
charmedbeauty said:
the coils were placed on top of each other so the length of the coil (x) is now 2x.

then we dropped the magnet through them so at some point I guess the magnet could have been in both coils at the same time since the length of the magnet was ≈x/2.

does this make sense.

??
That's how you placed them for parallel coils. How did you place them for series connection?
 
  • #11
NascentOxygen said:
That's how you placed them for parallel coils. How did you place them for series connection?


the same way
 
  • #12
charmedbeauty said:
the same way
http://imageshack.us/a/img717/4080/3110y.gif ... there lies your problem.

To succeed in demonstrating what you expect, then the EMFs in each coil will have to be identical, i.e., generated simultaneously. If the magnet has to pass through one coil before it enters the second, then (without careful analysis) it's anyone's guess how the result will pan out.

Were I to do it, I would try concentric windings.

What device were you using to measure the voltage?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
NascentOxygen said:
http://imageshack.us/a/img717/4080/3110y.gif ... there lies your problem.

To succeed in demonstrating what you expect, then the EMFs in each coil will have to be identical, i.e., generated simultaneously. If the magnet has to pass through one coil before it enters the second, then (without careful analysis) it's anyone's guess how the result will pan out.

Were I to do it, I would try concentric windings.

What device were you using to measure the voltage?

just a voltmeter
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
836
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K