Health affects due to aboveground nuclear bomb explosions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the health impacts of aboveground nuclear bomb explosions conducted by the US from 1945 until the ban in 1963, which resulted in significant nuclear fallout. Participants express concern over the lack of comprehensive studies tracking the correlation between these explosions and subsequent health issues, particularly cancer. While some health physicists have conducted research, the discussion highlights a gap in extensive, government-supported studies that account for the broader population's health outcomes. The need for resources detailing medical research on this topic is emphasized, alongside inquiries about similar studies conducted by other nations such as Russia, France, and the UK.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fallout and its health implications
  • Familiarity with epidemiological research methods
  • Knowledge of historical context regarding nuclear testing
  • Awareness of health physics and related journals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of aboveground nuclear testing in the US and its global counterparts
  • Explore epidemiological studies linking nuclear fallout to cancer rates
  • Investigate health physics journals for articles on nuclear fallout effects
  • Examine governmental and independent reports on public health following nuclear tests
USEFUL FOR

Public health researchers, epidemiologists, historians, and anyone interested in the long-term health effects of nuclear fallout from aboveground nuclear explosions.

DrClapeyron
From 1945 until the US put a ban on aboveground nuclear explosions in the US, there were some 300 nuclear devices exploded aboveground in the US. These explosions lead to an eventual nuclear fallout. Anyone have resources like books or internet sites that detail the medical research and overall research of tracking this fallout and any subsequent rise in diseases such as cancer?

I have been told that such a study does not exist because at the time, in the 1950's, the US government did not want to incriminate itself. So consideration for nuclear fallout was restricted to where scientists and engineers believed the eventual fall out would land. So have any dedicated medical scientists (MD's, stats, engineers) tried to keep track of what this event did to the greater population, like how many people died, got sick or changes in mood and other behaviour?

For bonus points, has there at all been world wide study? I think Russia, France and UK did as much damage as the US.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Do you mean a comprehensive study ov the overall effects, or small localized studies? health physicists have been studying these effects for quite some time now, and you can find numerous articles in their journals. Take a look http://hps.org/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sounds like an interesting site, I will have to investifate further. However, when you say for quite some time is that indication that these studies are based on original research or based on data from others' research?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K