Heat added to system increases mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Mass System
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between heat added to a system and its mass, particularly in the context of thermodynamics and heat transfer. Participants explore the implications of internal energy changes and the proportionality of heat to mass and temperature changes.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the interpretation of a statement regarding heat and mass, with some suggesting that the wording may lead to confusion. Others explore the relationship between heat, mass, and temperature change, referencing specific equations and principles.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the relationship between heat and mass, with some participants providing clarifications and references to equations. There is an ongoing exploration of how temperature change relates to mass and heat, without a clear consensus on the original poster's assertion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the effects of mass change due to energy input are negligible in practical heat transfer calculations, while others highlight the importance of material properties and conditions in the discussion.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
According to this,
1683249472906.png

The heat added to the system is proportional to the mass. Does someone please know how that highlighted statement is so? I think it is because the heat increases the internal energy of a system and internal energy is the sum of the translational, rotational, and vibrational kinetic energies and also potential energy (I'm not sure what types thought). Therefore, the mass of the system should increase since the particles will have more mechanical energy.
1683249891836.png


Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a courtesy to reference the source of the quote. Please do so. "This" is not a reference
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Your highlighted sentence is just poorly worded, leading to your confusion. It is saying that the change in temperature is proportional to the mass, not that the mass changes.

The effect of E=mc^2 is entirely negligible in these heat transfer calculations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and member 731016
gmax137 said:
Your highlighted sentence is just poorly worded, leading to your confusion. It is saying that the change in temperature is proportional to the mass, not that the mass changes.

The effect of E=mc^2 is entirely negligible in these heat transfer calculations.
Thank you for your reply @gmax137!

However, how is the change in temperature proportional to the mass?

Many thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

According to this,
View attachment 325969
The heat added to the system is proportional to the mass. Does someone please know how that highlighted statement is so? I think it is because the heat increases the internal energy of a system and internal energy is the sum of the translational, rotational, and vibrational kinetic energies and also potential energy (I'm not sure what types thought). Therefore, the mass of the system should increase since the particles will have more mechanical energy.
View attachment 325970

Many thanks!
Material matters as well as atmosphere. Some materials will begin oxidizing or dissolving.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

According to this,
View attachment 325969
The heat added to the system is proportional to the mass. Does someone please know how that highlighted statement is so? I think it is because the heat increases the internal energy of a system and internal energy is the sum of the translational, rotational, and vibrational kinetic energies and also potential energy (I'm not sure what types thought). Therefore, the mass of the system should increase since the particles will have more mechanical energy.
View attachment 325970

Many thanks!
I think you got off track there.
Q = mCpΔT -->> Equation 1.5 in the book
is the formula that is being discussed

The equation says that the heat added is proportional to the mass and to the change in temperature, with a conversion facture denoted by Cp
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137 and DrClaude
gmax137 said:
the change in temperature is proportional to the mass
I don’t think you meant that.

@ChiralSuperfields, It says that the heat injected is proportional to the mass (all else being constant, including the temperature rise) and the heat injected is proportional to the temperature rise (all else being constant, including the mass).
Combining the two, the heat injected is proportional to the product of the temperature rise and the mass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and DrClaude
If you want to warm two bricks, it takes twice as much heat as to warm only one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and Steve4Physics
  • #10
haruspex said:
I don’t think you meant that.
You're right, it was late here when I wrote that.
256bits said:
Q = mCpΔT -->> Equation 1.5 in the book
This ^^
Or, in words:
jbriggs444 said:
If you want to warm two bricks, it takes twice as much heat as to warm only one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #12
ChiralSuperfields said:
Therefore, the mass of the system should increase

Keep in mind, that the text you quoted also wrote "to a good approximation".

For instance, lets take 1 kilogram of water. Raising its temperature by 1 K requires energy 4182 J.
This is equivalent to, according to ##E=mc^2## the mass ##4.6\cdot 10^{-14}## kg.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #13
malawi_glenn said:
Keep in mind, that the text you quoted also wrote "to a good approximation".

For instance, lets take 1 kilogram of water. Raising its temperature by 1 K requires energy 4182 J.
This is equivalent to, according to ##E=mc^2## the mass ##4.6\cdot 10^{-14}## kg.
We could flip it around the other way. If we add enough heat to double the mass, that will increase the temperature by roughly 21 trillion degrees. By which point the the specific heat of the substance may no longer be unchanged "to a good approximation".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and malawi_glenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K