Heat from an A/C inverter calculation more than energy consumed?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency of inverter air conditioners, specifically whether they can output more heat energy than the electrical energy consumed. Participants explore the principles of heat pumps, their efficiency compared to standard electric heaters, and the implications of the coefficient of performance (COP) in various scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that inverter air conditioners can output significantly more heat than the electrical energy consumed due to their operation as heat pumps, which extract additional heat from the environment.
  • Others argue that while heat pumps are more efficient than electric heaters, the claim of using "4 times less energy" may be overly optimistic, depending on temperature differentials.
  • A participant clarifies that heat pumps operate by converting low-temperature heat from the environment into high-temperature heat for indoor use, which can lead to greater efficiency compared to direct electric heating.
  • There is mention of different types of heat pump systems (air-water, water-water, air-air) and their respective efficiencies.
  • Some participants question the thermodynamic principles involved, particularly regarding the Carnot cycle and the conditions under which high efficiencies (COP of 4 or 5) can be achieved, especially at low temperatures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that heat pumps can be more efficient than standard electric heaters, but there is no consensus on the extent of this efficiency or the validity of specific performance claims. Multiple competing views remain regarding the conditions affecting efficiency and the thermodynamic principles involved.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include assumptions about ideal heat pump cycles and the impact of temperature differences on efficiency. There are unresolved questions about the applicability of certain thermodynamic principles to modern heat pump technologies.

pd2905
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys can anyone please tell me that it is possible with an air conditioner of type inverter to put less energy than what the piece is receiving as heat. So let's say that on the inverter it says output KWh/ input KWh =4.

Henthalpy= G+TS
4*Hinput= Houtput inside the house

So to heat my house I use 4 times less energy if I just used a normal electric heater or this is what they write in product description?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you use a standard electric heater, 100% of the electric energy consumed is converted in heat.

But, in if a 'heat pump', you use the electric energy to drive a compressor, and the machine converts low-temperature heat, available in the external surroundings, in the external air, mainly, to high temperature heat, that may be used to heat your room. The 'transportation cost' is lower than the energy costs of a resistance heater of the same heating power. How much lower depends on the difference of inside/outside temperatures. The larger the difference, the smaller the advantage with respect to a resistance heater.

A refrigerator (or heat pump, that is the same) is esentially a thermal engine working in reverse. Instead of taking heat from a high-temperature place, producing useful mechanical work, and discharging that low-temp heat in a low-temperature place, the refrigerator/heat pump takes low-temp heat from a low temperature place, injects mechanical power, and places the resulting high-temp heat in a high temperature environment...I believe that using '4 times less energy' may be too optimistic...
 
Last edited:
I guess that what you are describing is more commonly known as a heat pump. If that is the case, then indeed you get more heat out than the electricity input, as additional heat is extracted from the outside air. This is more efficient than direct electric heating.
 
This two very clear pictures are from 'The Second Law', by Henry Bent:

15599507266_916eb43343.jpg
15436560709_bc1ee81394.jpg
 
NTW said:
If you use a standard electric heater, 100% of the electric energy consumed is converted in heat.

But, in if a 'heat pump', you use the electric energy to drive a compressor, and the machine converts low-temperature heat, available in the external surroundings, in the external air, mainly, to high temperature heat, that may be used to heat your room. The 'transportation cost' is lower than the energy costs of a resistance heater of the same heating power. How much lower depends on the difference of inside/outside temperatures. The larger the difference, the smaller the advantage with respect to a resistance heater.

A refrigerator (or heat pump, that is the same) is esentially a thermal engine working in reverse. Instead of taking heat from a high-temperature place, producing useful mechanical work, and discharging that low-temp heat in a low-temperature place, the refrigerator/heat pump takes low-temp heat from a low temperature place, injects mechanical power, and places the resulting high-temp heat in a high temperature environment...I believe that using '4 times less energy' may be too optimistic...
Thanks for your input,
Just to add to this
For an ideal heat pump cycle:

COP = TH/(TL-TH)
source wikipedia.
 
DrClaude said:
I guess that what you are describing is more commonly known as a heat pump. If that is the case, then indeed you get more heat out than the electricity input, as additional heat is extracted from the outside air. This is more efficient than direct electric heating.

Thanks for the reply DrClaude, just to add to your thing there is heat pump systems that are air-water, water-water and air-air( air conditioner inverter).
For an ideal heat pump cycle:

COP = TH/(TL-TH)
source wikipedia.
 
NTW said:
This two very clear pictures are from 'The Second Law', by Henry Bent:

15599507266_916eb43343.jpg
15436560709_bc1ee81394.jpg
How does delta S stay zero in both directions? So the reversed Carnot is the refrigeration cycle, but do these heat pumps use only one cycle, and is it possible that they have some newer technologies so that the efficiency of an air-air heat pump reaches 4 or 5 up to -20 degrees C?
 
pd2905 said:
How does delta S stay zero in both directions? So the reversed Carnot is the refrigeration cycle, but do these heat pumps use only one cycle, and is it possible that they have some newer technologies so that the efficiency of an air-air heat pump reaches 4 or 5 up to -20 degrees C?

400K reservoir ---> ΔE (cal) = -1200 cal ΔS (cal/K) = -3 cal/K
300K reservoir ---> ΔE (cal) = +900 cal ΔS (cal/K) = +3 cal/K
Weight -------------> ΔE (cal) = +300 cal

Balance -----------> ΔE = 0 cal ΔS = 0 cal/k
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K