Heat Transfer and Combustion -- A furnace wall consists of three layers of material

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating thermal resistance, heat loss, and interface temperatures for a furnace wall composed of three materials: firebrick, insulating brick, and ordinary brick. The thermal conductivities are 1.15 W m–1 K–1 for firebrick, 0.17 W m–1 K–1 for insulating brick, and 0.62 W m–1 K–1 for ordinary brick. The total thermal resistance is calculated as 12.174 m² K W⁻¹, leading to a heat loss of approximately 57 W m⁻². The temperatures at the interfaces are determined to be 640.959°C and 272.112°C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal resistance calculations using the formula R_a = L/k
  • Knowledge of heat transfer principles, specifically Fourier's law
  • Familiarity with temperature gradient calculations in multi-layer systems
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions (e.g., mm to m)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of equivalent thermal resistance in series systems
  • Learn about Fourier's law of heat conduction in detail
  • Explore advanced heat transfer modeling techniques using software like ANSYS or COMSOL
  • Investigate insulation materials and their thermal properties for improved energy efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, thermal system designers, and students studying heat transfer principles will benefit from this discussion, particularly those involved in furnace design and thermal management.

Tiberious
Messages
71
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A furnace wall consists of three layers of material as shown below.

The thermal conductivities are:

Firebrick = 1.15 W m–1 K–1

Insulating brick = 0.17 W m–1 K–1

Ordinary brick = 0.62 W m–1 K–1

Calculate:

  1. (i) the thermal resistance of each layer
  2. (ii) the heat loss per unit area
  3. (iii) the temperature at the two interfaces.

Homework Equations


The Thermal Resistance of each layer.

Given equation:
R_a= L/k

The Heat Loss per unit area.

Given equation:

q= ((T_1-T_2))/R_a

The Attempt at a Solution



The Thermal Resistance of each layer.

Given equation:
R_a= L/k

Thermal Resistance of Firebrick:
L=220mm=2.2〖0m〗^(-3)
k=1.15 W m-1 K-1

R_a= (2.〖20〗^(-3))/(1.15 )=1.913 m^2 K W^(-1)
Thermal Resistance of the Insulating Brick:
L=110mm=1.1〖0m〗^(-3)
k=0.17 W m-1 K-1
R_a= (1.〖10〗^(-3))/(0.17 )=6.471 m^2 K W^(-1)
Thermal Resistance of the Ordinary Brick:
L=110mm=2.35^(-3)
k=0.17 W m-1 K-1

R_a= (2.〖35〗^(-3))/0.62=3.790 m^2 K W^(-1) The Heat Loss per unit area.

Given equation:

q= ((T_1-T_2))/R_a

Temperature One: 750
Temperature Two: 56

Heat Loss per unit area Firebrick:

q= ((750-56))/(1.913 m^2 K W^(-1) )

q=362.781 W m^(-2)

Heat Loss per unit area Insulating Brick:

q= ((750-56))/(6.471 m^2 K W^(-1) )

q=107.248 W m^(-2)

Heat Loss per unit area Ordinary Brick:

q= ((750-56))/(3.790 m^2 K W^(-1) )
q=183.113 W m^(-2)
The Temperature at the two interfaces.

Determine the total resistance

R_a= R_a12+ R_a23+ R_a34
Inputting our known values

R_a= 1.91 + 6.47+ 3.79 =12.174 m^2 K W^(-1)

= 12.174

Heat Loss per unit area

q= (T_1-T_4)/R_a

= ((750-56))/(12.174 )

≈57 W m^(-1)We can now determine the temperature at the interfaces.

Determining the temperature at interface one.

q_12=q

q=57 W m^(-1)

So,
q_12= (T_(1-) T_2)/R_a12

→ T^1-T^2= R_a12 q_12

= 1.913∙57

=109.041 °C

Determine T_2

T_2= T_1-109.041

=750-109.041
Temperature at interface one.

=640.959°C

Determining the temperature at interface two.

q_23=q

q=57 W m^(-1)

So,
q_23= (T_1-T_2)/R_a23

→ T^2-T^3= R_a23 q_23

=6.471 ∙57

=368.847°C

Determine T_3

T_3= T_2-368.85

= 640.959-368.847
Temperature at interface Two.

=272.112°C

Finally,

=3.790 ∙57

=216.03
Determine T_4

T_4= T_3-216.03

= 272.112-216.03

≈56°C
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a bit hard to read all that on my small phone but...

You appear to calculate the heat loss incorrectly.

The heat flows through all three materials one after the other. So you should calculate the total euivalent series resistance. Then temperature drop occurs across that equivalent resistance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K