Heat transfer in series and parallel

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around heat transfer in series and parallel configurations, focusing on the mathematical relationships governing the rates of heat flow through different materials with varying thermal conductivities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the steady-state heat transfer equations and discuss the implications of different configurations on heat flow rates. Questions arise regarding the setup of the problem, particularly in part B, where the original poster expresses uncertainty about how to approach the comparison of conductors in series versus parallel.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the nature of the heat flow rates and discussing the need to express answers in terms of thermal conductivities rather than numerical values. There is recognition that part B may not have a definitive answer, leading to further exploration of the implications of varying thermal conductivities.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the question may be poorly posed, particularly regarding the expectations for numerical answers versus expressions in terms of variables. There is also mention of the need to clarify the relevance of certain information provided in the problem statement.

knc
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


dtMAAyF.png


Homework Equations


P = k A \frac{dT}{dx}

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
Assuming steady state transfer, energy transfers through rods at the same rate everywhere.
Letting T be the temperature at the point of welding.

P_1 = k_1 A \frac{T_h-T}{L} \\ P_2 = k_2 A \frac{T - T_c}{L}
Setting rates equal to represent steady-state system:
k_1 A \frac{T_h-T}{L} = k_2 A \frac{T - T_c}{L}
Solving for T:
T = \frac{k_1 T_h + k_2 T_c}{k_1 + k_2}
Plugging this into either equation for individual rod:
P = \frac{T_h - T_c}{L} \frac{k_1k_2}{k_1 + k_2} A

a)
I don't know where to begin with part B. I would imagine I would try to find a ratio between the conductors in series and parallel.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Setting up the ratio of the powers for the two cases would be a reasonable approach. See if you can show that part (b) does not have a definite answer. So, the question is not well posed. [EDIT: Consider the ratio of the powers for the case where k1 and k2 are equal and the case where k1 is much smaller than k2 (i.e., k1 is now a good insulator.)]
 
Last edited:
You will need to give the answer in terms of k1 and k2 rather than a numerical answer.
 
In b, what is the rate of heat flow through rod A? What is the rate of heat flow through rod B. What is the total rate of heat flow through the two rods in parallel.
 
I can easily find the heat flow through each individual rod, I am just not sure if I can add them together to represent the overall rate of heat...
 
knc said:
I can easily find the heat flow through each individual rod, I am just not sure if I can add them together to represent the overall rate of heat...
Yes, for the parallel rods, the total rate of heat flow is the sum of the individual rates. What is your reservation about this?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
Finding the total heat flow in configuration b)
P = P_1 + P_2
P_1 = k_1 A \frac{T_h - T_c}{L} \\ P_2 = k_2 A \frac{T_h - T_c}{L}
P = (k_1 + k_2) A \frac{T_h - T_c}{L}

We are trying to find time taken to conduct 10J, difference in temperature is 100C.

P = \frac{\Delta Q}{\Delta t} \\ \frac{10}{t} = (k_1+k_2)A \frac{100}{L}
Rearranging:
t = \frac{L}{10 A (k_1 + k_2)}

I don't see how the first bit of information regarding the heat flow rate of the first configuration is relevant.
 
knc said:
t = \frac{L}{10 A (k_1 + k_2)}

I don't see how the first bit of information regarding the heat flow rate of the first configuration is relevant.
Your expression for t is OK. You could use the first bit to eliminate L/A so that the answer for t is expressed in terms of just k1 and k2.
I found the question to be a little odd. When I first read it, I thought that the answer to part (b) should be a numerical answer. But, the best you can do is express the answer in terms of k1 and k2. Actually, you can express it in terms of just the ratio k1/k2. But you can't get a numerical answer.
 
Here is what I got:
P_a = \frac{10}{120} = \frac{100}{L}\frac{k_1 k_2}{k_1 + k_2} A
\frac{L}{A} = 1200 \frac{k_1 k_2}{k_1 + k_2}
Plugging into t:
t = \frac{120 (k_1 k_2)}{(k_1 + k_2)^2}
 
  • #10
That looks correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: knc
  • #11
One thing we can conclude is that, irrespective of k1 and k2, the time for (b) is less than 30 seconds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: knc
  • #12
Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K