Derivation process? (Heatsink Fin Heat Conduction Equations)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 6K views
EastWindBreaks
Messages
128
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2018-4-23_4-36-37.png


upload_2018-4-23_4-37-2.png

I don't understand the derivation of the right side of the last equation.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



upload_2018-4-23_5-8-11.png

I got to this point, I also don't understand why it did not include C_2 for the variation of temp. along the fin.
I am guessing the right side is the rate of heat transfer on the tip? which equals to the rate of heat transfer at x=0 under steady state. but i failed to see how they are equivalent, I don't understand where did sqrt( hpkA)*(Tb-T_inf) came from. any help would be appreciated!

 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-23_4-36-37.png
    upload_2018-4-23_4-36-37.png
    49.6 KB · Views: 5,909
  • upload_2018-4-23_4-37-2.png
    upload_2018-4-23_4-37-2.png
    48.2 KB · Views: 2,324
  • upload_2018-4-23_5-8-11.png
    upload_2018-4-23_5-8-11.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 1,509
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second equation should be θb = θ(0) = C1 + C2, instead of 2. and since C1 = 0, C2 = θb. Now when you differentiate θ(x) wrt x and multiply both sides by -kA at x=0, it should work out OK.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks and berkeman
Dr Dr news said:
Your second equation should be θb = θ(0) = C1 + C2, instead of 2. and since C1 = 0, C2 = θb. Now when you differentiate θ(x) wrt x and multiply both sides by -kA at x=0, it should work out OK.
thank you, I got it now. the reason we differentiate θ(x) is because T_inf is treated as a constant right? therefore it is same as dT/dx.
 
Last edited:
That is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks