Heating Question: Visible Light & Infra Red

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sadhu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the heating effects of visible light compared to infrared radiation, exploring why visible light, despite having higher energy photons, may have different heating impacts. Participants examine concepts related to energy absorption, the behavior of different light sources, and the implications of conservation of energy in heating applications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that visible light has a greater heating effect than infrared radiation due to its higher energy photons.
  • Others argue that the percentage of energy absorbed as heat may differ, questioning what determines this percentage.
  • One participant notes that fluorescent tubes are less hot than incandescent bulbs, suggesting that different light sources emit varying spectra and heat differently.
  • There is a discussion about the absorption characteristics of materials, with questions raised about how surfaces interact with visible and infrared light.
  • Some participants propose that if all energy is absorbed equally, then 1 W of infrared should heat the same as 1 W of visible light, leading to further exploration of the implications of this assumption.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the heating effects of visible light versus infrared radiation, with no consensus reached on the relative effectiveness of each in heating applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of energy absorption and heating outcomes.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the complexities of light emission spectra and the absorption characteristics of various materials, indicating that these factors may influence the heating effects but are not fully resolved in the discussion.

sadhu
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
why do visible light have less heating affect than infra red radiations ,in spite of the fact that photon of visible light have more energy...
 
Science news on Phys.org
It doesn't. Visible light is more energetic, which means for the same number of photons, you get more heat when you absorb it.
 
OK, visible light have more energy than IR. But the percentage of total energy to heat the absober may be less .
 
pixel01 said:
OK, visible light have more energy than IR. But the percentage of total energy to heat the absober may be less .

and what determines that percentage...
 
russ_watters said:
It doesn't. Visible light is more energetic, which means for the same number of photons, you get more heat when you absorb it.

ok then why does a fluorescent tube is less hot then a bulb after sane time
certainly glass absorbs far more infra red radiations than visible light , but the thing is same with other substances , otherwise why don't we use a bulb to warm the room instead of heater of same power ..?
 
sadhu said:
why do visible light have less heating affect than infra red radiations ,in spite of the fact that photon of visible light have more energy...
Think about conservation of energy, where does the energy from the light go? What happens if you shine visible light on a black surface? What happens if you shine the same amount of visible light on a white surface? Are most surfaces "black" or "white" to infra red?
 
sadhu said:
ok then why does a fluorescent tube is less hot then a bulb after sane time
certainly glass absorbs far more infra red radiations than visible light , but the thing is same with other substances , otherwise why don't we use a bulb to warm the room instead of heater of same power ..?
Fluorescent lamps produce mostly UV light. When the UV strikes the coating on the lamp, it causes the coating to fluoresce, emitting visible light.

It is important to remember that certain devices don't necessarily emit a uniform or continuous spectrum. And even for ones that do, like light bulbs, they may emit more in the IR range than in the visible light range. The black body distribution of frequencies isn't consistent, it is a bell curve. See halfway down the page: http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/sun/spectrum.html
 
Last edited:
well i never said that IR is more energetic
 
ok then you mean to say that visible light have same heating affect like IR provided they are absorbed by the substances ...
and a heater and bulb of same power will heat a room equally

thanks now i get it...
 
  • #10
A heater and a light bulb of the same wattage will heat a room equally, but the spectrums of light that they create to do that will be different. The light bulb will heat the room with about 1/4 visible light and the heater almost all infrared.
 
  • #11
sadhu said:
well i never said that IR is more energetic
No one said you did. But it is a logical contradiction that you were operating under, to believe something that was more energetic could produce less heat.
 
  • #12
sadhu said:
ok then you mean to say that visible light have same heating affect like IR provided they are absorbed by the substances ...
and a heater and bulb of same power will heat a room equally

thanks now i get it...
Exactly. Assuming that they are all completely absorbed 1 W of IR heats the same as 1 W of UV which heats the same as 1 W of visible light which heats the same as 1 W of radio ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K