Undergrad Heavier bosons and their function and detection

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Heavier bosons, specifically the W and H bosons, necessitate high-energy accelerators for detection as separate particles, despite their functionality within the lower ambient energy of the universe. These bosons operate as quantum fields without requiring high energy for their existence. The discussion clarifies the distinction between quantum fields and virtual particles, emphasizing that while virtual particles are a mathematical construct used in perturbative calculations, quantum fields are fundamental entities in quantum field theory (QFT). Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping the nature of particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Particle Physics Fundamentals
  • High-Energy Physics Experiments
  • Mathematical Concepts in Perturbation Theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Explore the role of high-energy accelerators in particle detection
  • Research the mathematical framework of perturbative calculations
  • Examine the differences between virtual particles and real particles in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and researchers interested in the detection and functionality of heavier bosons in quantum field theory.

Ranku
Messages
434
Reaction score
18
Heavier bosons like ##W## or ##H## require high energy accelerator to be detected. Yet these bosons fulfill their function in the ambient energy of the universe. Why is it that their detection takes high energy environment but their function is possible in lower ambient energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ranku said:
Heavier bosons like ##W## or ##H## require high energy accelerator to be detected.

They require a high energy experiment to be detected as separate particles. They do not require a high energy environment to function as quantum fields.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
PeterDonis said:
They require a high energy experiment to be detected as separate particles. They do not require a high energy environment to function as quantum fields.
So can these quantum fields be equivalently seen as virtual particles, that become real detectable particles upon the impartation of high energy?
 
Ranku said:
So can these quantum fields be equivalently seen as virtual particles,

No, these are different (but of course related) concepts. "Virtual particle" is a name for certain part of mathematics that we use when we do perturbative calculations. And this is the only place where virtual particles appear. Quantum fields are basic objects in QFT and trying to think that they can be equivalently seen as something else is not a good idea. You replace one relatively hard concept with other which you think is easier to grasp, and it's not. Fields are fields. Virtual particles are virtual particles, and real particles are yet another concept - a very specific states of the field. You can't mix those three concepts, they are important all by their own.
 
  • Informative
Likes Ranku
PeterDonis said:
They require a high energy experiment to be detected as separate particles. They do not require a high energy environment to function as quantum fields.
W and H are like a buddhist monk. They have a very low ground state, but need a lot of external excitation to get excited. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K