Heaviside function and dirac delta

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the derivative of the Heaviside function, H'(t), equals the Dirac delta function, δ(t). Participants clarify the steps involved in the proof, particularly the application of integration by parts and the product rule. The confusion arises around the transition from F(0) to the integral involving δ(t), with emphasis on the properties of the Dirac delta distribution. Participants highlight the importance of understanding the definition of the Dirac delta function, especially its integral properties. The conversation underscores the need for a solid grasp of generalized functions and distributions in this context.
KateyLou
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi there, i am trying to do a proof that H'(t)= δ(t)

Homework Equations



We have been given the following:

F is a smooth function such that lim (t-->±∞)F(t)=0
Therefore the integral between ±∞ of [H(t)F(t)]'=[H(t)F(t)]-∞=0

I understand it up until this point; however next it says:
"Integration by parts:
(1) = Integral between ±∞ of [H(f)'F(t)]dt
(2) = -the integral between ±∞ of H(t)F'(t)dt
(3) = -the integral between ∞ and 0 of F'(t)dt
(4) = [-F(t)]0
(5) = F(0)
(6) = Integral between ±∞ of δ(t)F(t)dt

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where they have got theequation from in (1) or (2) or (3)! I get 4 though and 5! Although i don't then get 6!

I think if i knew where (1) came from i maybe could get through the rest but i just don't know where it has come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KateyLou said:

Homework Statement



Hi there, i am trying to do a proof that H'(t)= δ(t)

Homework Equations



We have been given the following:

F is a smooth function such that lim (t-->±∞)F(t)=0
Therefore the integral between ±∞ of [H(t)F(t)]'=[H(t)F(t)]-∞=0

Do you understand that this says \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left(\frac{d}{dt}(H(t)F(t))\right)dt=0?

Since this is true for all functions F(t) such that lim (t-->±∞)F(t)=0, what must then be true of \frac{d}{dt}(H(t)F(t))?

Equation (1) follows from using that along with the product rule :\frac{d}{dt}(H(t)F(t))=H'(t)F(t)+H(t)F'(t)
 
Yes i think I get the =0 part (by the way how do you write equations like that?)
And thank you re: the product rule - not sure how i managed to miss that! will go back to it and see how far i get this time!
 
Right i have now completed this up to the last stage - i do not understand how it has gone from F(0) to \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left(\delta (t)F(t)\right)dt
 
And that is what defines the delta "function" (I have put "function" in quotes because it is not, of course, a "function", it is a "distribution" or "generalized function").
 
What definition are you using for the derivative here? Note that the heaviside function is discontinuous, so it isn't differentiable using the derivative you used in Calc I. (similarly, H(x)F(x) is not differentiable)

The generalizations I know of the derivative take (1) = (2) to be the definition. (With the requirement that F be a sufficiently good function; here we need at least differentiable and vanishing at infinity)

As for the last question, what do you know about the Dirac delta distribution? Even if you know only one thing about it, it's probably the thing you need to use...
 
i don't know what definition i am using... I have taken that straight from the maths notes we were given... (sorry!)

What do i know about the dirac delta function...well, the intergral of it is one, and that happens at t=0?
 
KateyLou said:
What do i know about the dirac delta function...well, the intergral of it is one, and that happens at t=0?
D'oh, you got me. :frown: If that's the only thing you've been taught about the dirac delta distribution, then you are incapable of finishing this problem. (And so shame on your teacher for assigning it!) The step you are stuck upon is often used as the definition of the dirac delta.
 
ha! ok!
So what is this definition then? I think i shall go an google it...
 
  • #10
kateylou said:
ha! Ok!
So what is this definition then? I think i shall go an google it...

(5) = (6)
 
  • #11
oh! lol!
Thank you guys :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K