Heaviside (Unit step function) question

Click For Summary
The function f(t) is defined piecewise, and the discussion focuses on expressing it using the Heaviside function. The proposed expression for f(t) includes terms like u(t) and u(t-2), but there is confusion regarding the correct formulation and signs. Participants suggest evaluating the function for specific t values to clarify the correct representation. The Laplace transform of f(t) is discussed, emphasizing the need to manipulate the Heaviside function correctly to compute it. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the construction of f(t) and its Laplace transform using the Heaviside function.
math_04
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The function f(t) is defined for t>=0 by

f(t) = 1 for 0<= t <= 1 , t-2 for 1 <=t <= 2 and 0 for t >2

Express f(t) in terms of the Heaviside function and hence or otherwise find L(f(t)), the Laplace transform of f(t)



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So i figured out the Heaviside function is

f(t) = u (t) - (t-2)u(t-2) + u(t-2)

Is the above function right? One more thing, how do u figure out the signs like how do u know it is u(t-2) instead of -u(t-2)?

So to find L(f(t) how do u do do that. I know that u(t) has to be changed to something else but thing is I have no idea how to manipulate these kind of functions. Please do offer help.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you check it? Suppose 0 <= t <= 1. Then f(t) = 1.
What does the expression you gave evaluate to? What is the step function when the argument is negative and when it is positive?

So let's try it this way: can you construct a function in terms of theta functions that is constant 1 on the interval [a, b] and zero outside that?
 
math_04 said:

Homework Statement



The function f(t) is defined for t>=0 by

f(t) = 1 for 0<= t <= 1 , t-2 for 1 <=t <= 2 and 0 for t >2

Express f(t) in terms of the Heaviside function and hence or otherwise find L(f(t)), the Laplace transform of f(t)



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So i figured out the Heaviside function is

f(t) = u (t) - (t-2)u(t-2) + u(t-2)
That is exactly the same as u(t)- (t-3)u(t-2). Is that what you intended to write or is one of those supposed to be u(t-1)?

Is the above function right? One more thing, how do u figure out the signs like how do u know it is u(t-2) instead of -u(t-2)?
Why didn't you just try evaluating it for various t to see? In particular, if t is between 1 and 2, assuming that you meant f(t)= u(t)- (t-2)u(t-2)+ u(t-2), u(t) and u(t-1) would be 1 while u(t-2) would be 0. You would have f(t)= 1- (t-2)+ 0= 3- t. No, that's not what you want. Remember that once t> 0, u(t) stays 1. You can't just ignore it when t becomes greater than 1. Yes, since f(t)= 1 for t between 0 and 1, You want to start with u(t). But if you were to write f(t)= u(t)+ a(t)u(t-1), when t is between 1 and 2, you have f(t)= 1+ a(t)= t-2. What is a(t)? Finally, if you write f(t)= u(t)+ a(t)u(t-1)+ b(t)u(t-2), for t > 2, you have f(t)= 1+ a(t)+ b(t)= 0. Since you already know what a(t) is, it is easy to solve for b(t).


So to find L(f(t) how do u do do that. I know that u(t) has to be changed to something else but thing is I have no idea how to manipulate these kind of functions. Please do offer help.

Thanks.
u(t-a) is defined to be 0 if t< a, 1 if t\ge a. So f(t)u(t-a) is 0 if t< a, f(t) if t\ge a. Since the laplace transform of f(t) is defined to be
\int_0^\infty f(t)e^{-st}dt
the Laplace transform of f(t)u(t-a) is
\int_a^\infty f(t)e^{-st}dt
because the function value for t< a is just 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In general, if

f(t) = \begin{array}{c}g(t) \ \mbox{for} \ a\leq t \leq b \\ 0 \ \mbox{everywhere else} \ \end{array}

then f(t) = g(t)[u(t-b)-u(t-a)].
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K