Heaviside's Method for Regular Singular Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ted123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Regular
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/9868/heaviside.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should have y''+ py'+ qy= 0 and (x- x_0)^2q(x) finite. You have left out the "q"s. Also, you say that x_0 is a regular singular point if those are finite. In order that x_0 be a singular point, at least one of the two limits of p and q, as x goes to x_0 must not exist.

Yes, from what you have, x= 0 is a regular singular point for a and c, it not a regular singular point for d. But I would say that x= 0 is not even a singular point for b.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You should have y''+ py'+ qy= 0 and (x- x_0)^2q(x) finite. You have left out the "q"s. Also, you say that x_0 is a regular singular point if those are finite. In order that x_0 be a singular point, at least one of the two limits of p and q, as x goes to x_0 must not exist.

Yes, from what you have, x= 0 is a regular singular point for a and c, it not a regular singular point for d. But I would say that x= 0 is not even a singular point for b.

Yes, I accidently missed the q's. And thanks for the explanation. I think the definition should read 'A singular point x_0 is called regular if both those are finite as x-> x_0.'