Regular singular points of 2nd order ODE

  • #1
Jerbearrrrrr
127
0

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6778/complex.png

I did the coefficient of the w' term. What about the w term?

This seems like a fairly standard thing, but I can't seem to find it anywhere.
What ansatz should I use for q, if the eqn is written w''+pw'+qw?
C/(z-a)²+ D/(z-b)²?
Any conditions, except for the one generated by z->1/t substitution?
Or should I use C+cz on the top, etc?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Jerbearrrrrr said:

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6778/complex.png

I did the coefficient of the w' term. What about the w term?

This seems like a fairly standard thing, but I can't seem to find it anywhere.
What ansatz should I use for q, if the eqn is written w''+pw'+qw?
C/(z-a)²+ D/(z-b)²?
Any conditions, except for the one generated by z->1/t substitution?
Or should I use C+cz on the top, etc?

Well, if a 2nd order ODE has regular singular points at [itex]z=a[/itex] and [itex]z=b[/itex], then [itex]q[/itex] has poles up to 2nd order at those points, and the most general form of [itex]q[/itex] is then

[tex]q(x)=\frac{g(z)}{(z-a)^2(z-b)^2}[/tex]

where [itex]g(z)[/itex] is analytic everywhere. You should have used similar reasoning to find

[tex]p(z)=\frac{f(z)}{(z-a)(z-b)}[/itex]

Then just apply the linearity condition to find [itex]f[/itex] and [itex]g[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
980
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top