Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and its implications for the transition from quantum physics to classical physics as the reduced Planck constant (h-bar) approaches zero. Participants are exploring the relationship between uncertainty in position and momentum, and how this relates to kinetic energy in both realms.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to articulate the implications of the uncertainty relation, particularly in terms of standard deviations of position and momentum. Questions arise about the completeness of explanations and the nature of momentum in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the interpretation of the uncertainty relation, suggesting that the standard deviations of position and momentum are key to understanding the principle. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of h-bar approaching zero and how that affects the relationship between uncertainty and classical physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the nature of momentum and its standard deviation in quantum mechanics, questioning the assertion that momentum cannot be zero. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to reconcile quantum and classical perspectives.

K.QMUL
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Explain, using the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, how classical physics is reached a a limit of quantum physics when (h-bar) tends to 0.

Homework Equations



ΔxΔp(x) ≥ (h-bar)/2

The Attempt at a Solution



The only reasonable answer I can formulate is the fact that when 'h-bar' is zero, the momentum/its kinetic energy is greater than or equal to zero. However in classical physics the kinetic energy of an object can be zero (if its at rest), whereas in Quantum physics, using the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle above, it cannot be zero.

Any help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're almost there. Take note that the delta-x and delta-p in the uncertainty relation are not the position and the momentum of the particle, but the standard derivations of them, which measure the "uncertainty" of each variable.

Therefore if the right-hand-side is 0 there is actually no restriction on them, as the relation would only state that their product must be positive and that is always true (they are both always positive).

If the bar-h is not cero, though, we run into problems. Imagine you have a "fixed" delta-x and a delta-p that decreases over time (because we perform better experiments, for example). The product on the left-hand-side will decrease as well, and eventually it will be equal to the right-hand-side, so that another decreasing would "break" the rule, it would make it lower. According to the Uncertainty Principle one of two things should then occur: either delta-p would stop decreasing (we could not do a better experiment) or either delta-x would start increasing (experiments would show more accurate p measures but less acurate x measures).

I hope this helps.
 
Thanks, that does help! But is my explanation complete if I consider it to be standard deviations? Is there anything else I am missing to explain?
 
K.QMUL said:
Thanks, that does help! But is my explanation complete if I consider it to be standard deviations? Is there anything else I am missing to explain?

Mmm, not quite. You say that in quantum mechanics momentum can't be zero. I don't see why neither momentum or its standard derivation could not be zero.

Let me put the relation on words: if delta-p or delta-x decrease the other one must increase (or viceversa) so that their product is always a minimum (namely h-bar/2). If that minimum is satisfied (because it is really little or even zero) they can take pretty much any value.
 
Right, sorry, I forgot to put that in. I did write that down previously however. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K