Hello, I found a weird sentence in a book about enzymes....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of enzymes in lowering activation energy during chemical reactions, specifically addressing a statement from a book that suggests enzymes provide a lower-energy reaction path through covalent interactions. Participants explore the implications of this statement in relation to the principle that free energy is independent of the reaction path.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the compatibility of the book's statement with the principle that free energy is path-independent, seeking clarification on their understanding.
  • Another participant uses an analogy of two paths between villages to illustrate that while the overall energy difference remains constant, the activation energy required can vary depending on the path taken.
  • A third participant emphasizes that enzymes act as catalysts, lowering the activation energy required to reach the transition state without altering the overall free energy difference between reactants and products.
  • A later reply reiterates that the free energy difference remains unchanged, but the activation energy required for the enzyme-catalyzed reaction is lower compared to the uncatalyzed reaction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that enzymes do not change the overall free energy difference between reactants and products, but there is ongoing debate about the implications of this in relation to the book's statement and the principle of path independence.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of activation energy and the role of enzymes may not be fully articulated, and the discussion does not resolve the apparent conflict between the book's statement and established chemical principles.

samy4408
Messages
62
Reaction score
9
Hello !
We all now that enzymes lower the activation energy by creating both covalent bonds and week non covalent bonds , in this book , about how the enzyme lower the activation energy using covalent bonds they said :
"Covalent interactions between
enzymes and substrates lower the activation energy (and thereby accelerate
the reaction) by providing an alternative, lower-energy reaction path"
this sentence is not compatible with a basic principle that i learned in chemistry that says "the free energy is independent of the path "
can anyone show me what is wrong with my understanding ? thanks !
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Consider two villages in neighbouring valleys. Imagine two paths between those villages, one over a mountain peak, one through a pass between the mountains. The difference in height between the start and finish points is the same for each path, but the height you have to climb on the way is not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
The enzyme doesn't change the total energy difference between the two states, i.e. the free energy stays the same. It's merely a catalyst, providing that lower-energy reaction path.

It just lowers the activation energy's "potential hill" that has to be overcome to switch between the two states.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
Here's a nice diagram illustrating the point:
1652537554205.png

image source: https://socratic.org/questions/what-are-activation-energies

As others in the thread have said, the free energy difference between the reactants and products is still the same. However, the path between the two needs a higher activation energy without the enzyme whereas the path for the enzyme catalyzed reaction requires a smaller activation energy.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt, pinball1970 and jim mcnamara
mjc123 said:
Consider two villages in neighbouring valleys. Imagine two paths between those villages, one over a mountain peak, one through a pass between the mountains. The difference in height between the start and finish points is the same for each path, but the height you have to climb on the way is not.
Thanks a lot !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
21K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K