Help me convert Boltzmann distribution/partition function into Geometric series

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around converting the Boltzmann distribution and partition function into a geometric series for a harmonic oscillator with energy level spacing. The user is attempting to calculate the fraction of particles in the ν = 3 energy level for various values of e/kT, but struggles with expressing the partition function as an infinite series. They mention that their professor suggested a geometric series representation, which the user doubts leads to correct results. The thread seeks clarification on how to properly express the series to achieve sensible answers, referencing a specific problem for context. Accurate expression of the partition function is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
asdfTT123
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3. The following calculaltion shows how the ratio of e to kT affects the
populations of different energy levels. kT is sometimes called the thermal
energy; if it is small relative to e, a particle will not be able to access higher
energy states.
Consider a harmonic oscillator with spacing νe/kT between energy levels, where
ν can take on the values 0, 1, 2, etc.Calculate the fraction of particles in the ν = 3
energy level for e/kT = 4, 1, and 0.2.

Note: The definition of a harmonic oscillator is that the energy levels are equally spaced so the spacing between energy levels is identical.

Homework Equations



The only equations you need for this is the Boltzmann distribution and partition function,

Boltzmann Distribution:
ni/N = e^(-eiB)/z

z = Partition function = summation of e^(-eiB)

B= 1/kT

k = Boltzmann constant = 1.381e-23 J/K

(Sorry for the poor notation but you can look these up online)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to do this problem and how to set it up, but the problem here is I don't know how to express the expression as an infinite series.

For example, let's say e/kT = 1:

ni/N = e^(-3 * 1)/(1 + e^(-1) + e^(-2) + e^(-3)...)

My professor says the equation can be expressed in the following geometric series:

1/(1 - e^(-e/kT))

I'm pretty sure that doesn't work because it doesn't result in sensible answers. Does anyone here know how to correctly express it in terms of a series? I realize my explanation is rather hazy but please consult this pdf (problem #3) for more information...you will see if you use his series you will not get the answers he has listed

http://ded.chm.jhu.edu/~pchem/AnswerKeys/Resources/HW Wk13 Ans.pdf

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the sum of an infinite GP? (Don't put constants equal to 1; sometimes it becomes difficult afterwards to see exactly where to put it back.)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K