Help me proove absolute value inequalities and Solve an Integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving absolute value inequalities and solving an integral, specifically focusing on the inequality |a-b| ≥ ||a|-|b|| and the function defined by the integral f(x)=∫₀^{√x} e^{t²} dt.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the proof of the absolute value inequality by breaking it into cases based on the signs of a and b. Questions arise regarding the completeness of these cases and the implications of the triangle inequality.
  • There is a discussion about proving the equality √((a+b)²) = |a+b|, with suggestions to square both sides as a potential approach.
  • Participants express confusion regarding the setup of the integral problem and the application of the chain rule, with some questioning the formulation of the function and the use of the fundamental theorem of calculus.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's reasoning, providing feedback on the approaches taken. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the triangle inequality and the fundamental theorem of calculus, though there is no explicit consensus on the proofs or methods discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the notation and setup of the integral problem, as well as the need for clarity in the application of mathematical principles like the chain rule and the fundamental theorem of calculus.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63
1) True or Fale?
|a-b| \geq ||a|-|b||

My solution: I broke this up into 4 different cases. 1. a> 0 b>0 2. a<0 b<0 and so on...
For each case, I ended up with a more simplified version of the inequality. For instance, in case 1 where I used a<0 and b<0, I ended up with the simplified statement of:
|-a+b|\geq|-a+b| Which is clearly equivalent.

Is this a correct way to prove that this statement is true?

2. With that being out of the way, how can I prove this statement to be true:
\sqrt{(a+b)^2} = |a+b|
Would I do the same thing and break it up into 4 cases?

3. This has been my most difficult problem so far.

For any x > 0, consider the function

f(x)=\int^{\sqrt{x}}_{0}e^{t^{2}}dt

Computer f'(x)

My work so far: I was told to use the chain rule where the inner function is \sqrt{x} and the outer is 0.

I'm not qutie sure what to do.. I imagine I take the antiderivative of this function using the chain rule?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:
1) True or Fale?
|a-b| \geq ||a|-|b||

My solution: I broke this up into 4 different cases. 1. a> 0 b>0 2. a<0 b<0 and so on...
For each case, I ended up with a more simplified version of the inequality. For instance, in case 1 where I used a<0 and b<0, I ended up with the simplified statement of:
|-a+b|\geq|-a+b| Which is clearly equivalent.

Is this a correct way to prove that this statement is true?
If you are only considering "1. a> 0, b> 0 2. a< 0 b< 0 and so on" HOW did you get to |-a+ b|? You also need to consider, in each of those cases a< b and a> b.

2. With that being out of the way, how can I prove this statement to be true:
\sqrt{(a+b)^2} = |a+b|
You know that |a|= |b| if and only if a^2= b^2, don't you?

Would I do the same thing and break it up into 4 cases?

3. This has been my most difficult problem so far.

For any x > 0, consider the function

f(x)=e^{t}dt
This makes no sense. The left side is a function but the right side is a differential. they can't be equal. Did you mean f(x)= \int e^t dt? If so finding f' is just the "fundamental theorem of Calculus".

Computer f'(x)

My work so far: I was told to use the chain rule where the inner function is \sqrt{x} and the outer is 0.
? There is NO square root in the problem you gave- and an "outer function" of 0 would just make the entire function 0.

I'm not qutie sure what to do.. I imagine I take the antiderivative of this function using the chain rule?
You said the problem was to find the derivative not the anti-derivative. What, exactly is the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Halls, Thanks for the reply:

Regarding 1)
To save space I cut my claims short. I did take into account a>b and b>a

2) So if I square both sides, I would receive (a+b)^2 = (a+b)^2 Hm. That makes a lot of sense.

3) It seems you may have quoted my question when I was editing/had a problem with the latex. The proper latex version is up now.
With that being said, I understand why the outer function of 0 would make the chain rule null. Maybe my TA was not looking at the problem carefully enough.

I will need to search through the Fundamental theorem of Calculus then.

Thank you for the input. It is appreciated.
 
RJLiberator said:
1) True or Fale?
|a-b| \geq ||a|-|b||

My solution: I broke this up into 4 different cases. 1. a> 0 b>0 2. a<0 b<0 and so on...
For each case, I ended up with a more simplified version of the inequality. For instance, in case 1 where I used a<0 and b<0, I ended up with the simplified statement of:
|-a+b|\geq|-a+b| Which is clearly equivalent.

Is this a correct way to prove that this statement is true?

Since you apparently solved it using many cases, I will suggest an easier way not needing all those cases. Start with$$
|a| = |(a-b)+b| \le |a-b| + |b|$$(I'm assuming you already have the triangle inequality here). So this gives you$$
|a|-|b| \le |a-b|$$. Now do you see how this same result with ##a## and ##b## switched gives you your required inequality?
 
Hey guys, I think I figured out the third problem. The integral problem using the fundamental theorem of calculus. Can anyone check my work:

1. denote a new function :
g'(x) = e^(x^2)
f(x)=g(sqrt(x))

Using the chain rule
f'(x) = 1/2(sqrt(x) * e^(sqrt(x)^2)

How does this look?

LCK, I am going to look into what you posted. One moment.
 
Surely, you can simplify "(sqrt(x))^2".
 
Excellent. e^x.

=)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K