Help Model Michelson-Morley Experiment | Learn Aether Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcAnthony
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the Michelson-Morley experiment, which aimed to determine whether light requires a medium, or "aether," to travel through. Participants express confusion about the experiment's relevance and seek simpler explanations or analogies to clarify its purpose. One analogy compares firing bullets from a moving car to illustrate how the experiment measured the speed of light in different directions. Ultimately, the experiment demonstrated that there was no detectable difference in light speed, leading to the conclusion that aether does not exist. This foundational result significantly impacted the understanding of light and motion in physics.
MarcAnthony
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Help with Modelling the Michelson-Morley Experimnt.

Hi Everyone, i have this assignment due in 2 weeks its on recreating a Model in class of the Michelson-Morley experiment to detect the aether. My first problem after a lot of research on youtube clips and just general study is, why?
I understand that they were trying to prove that light needs a medium to travel therefore they were trying to discovder the actual medium it does.
I did go to my teacher and asked her and she said a way to Model the experiement would be to hang a pendulum off a string have a fan blowing against it and release the pendulum each time, however I am struggling to see what relevance that has with the experiment.
So Could someone please tell me in lamens terms or with a good analogy what the MMX was actually trying to prove how it was conduct.

- I have read the textbook and i just can't grasp it i have never had this before its really fustrating. Please help thankyou, ask for any added information and i wil be glad to help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Michelson-Morley ??!

Hey guys would someone be able to explain in lamens terms the Michelson Morley experiment and what it was trying to achieve, i just cannot grasp it i understand that they were trying to find out if light requires a medium to travel through, however, what relevance does this have to the experiment, also could someone use adifferent analogy that isn't the swimmers one that just confuses me more. Thanks
 


If you are traveling in a car with two guns. You fire one forwards and one sideways. The bullet you fired forward will be going faster than the other because the bullet will have the added velocity of the car. But the car has no sideways component of velocity so the bullet you fired sideways will travel at its normal speed.

Basically this is what they did with laser beams and the earth. But they measured no difference in the laser beams and experimentally proved the constancy of the speed of light regardless of the speed of the source.

I think the originally were trying to measure ether drift but basically proved that the ether does not exist.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top