Why Is My Algebra Proof Not Working?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EsponV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around a user's struggle with an algebra proof involving induction. They initially misapplied the formula for powers of two, confusing 2*(2^n) with 2^(2n). After receiving feedback, they realized their error lay in incorrectly stating that 2^n + 2^n equals 2^(2n) instead of recognizing it as 2*2^n, which equals 2^(n+1). The user acknowledged the algebra mistake and expressed gratitude for the clarification. This highlights the importance of careful application of algebraic rules in mathematical proofs.
EsponV
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Greetings,

It's been awhile since I've done induction or proofs in general, but I could not figure out where I went wrong on this one for the life of me. If anyone has an idea it would be much appreciated. I've uploaded a picture of the problem in the book as well as of my work. I thought I did everything correct but the algebra isn't working out.

Thanks all.

Problem (12): http://imageshack.us/m/30/7931/20110512190557593.jpg

Attempted Solution: http://imageshack.us/m/812/3723/2011051222200544.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is 2*(2^n) equal to? [Hint: not 2^(2n)]
 
Right, so isn't 2*(2^n) = 2^(n+1) ?

But then I end up with 2^(2n) = 2^(n+1) which eventually leads to n = 1, yes?
 
EsponV said:
Right, so isn't 2*(2^n) = 2^(n+1) ?

But then I end up with 2^(2n) = 2^(n+1) which eventually leads to n = 1, yes?

I don't understand how you could end up with 2^{2n}=2^{n+1} again. If you apply the correct formula in the line

(2^n-1)+2^{(n+1)-1}=2^{n+1}-1

then surely you'd end up with something else??
 
Ah, I had been incorrectly stating that 2^n + 2^n = 2^2n instead of 2*2^n = 2^n+1. Thanks for the help, sorry about the algebra error.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K