Help needed to solve a static analysis for the design of the Shaft for a Grinding Machine

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the static analysis of a shaft for a grinding machine, which includes a transmission pulley, support, and grinding wheel. The user faces a challenge with having five unknowns (N, T1, T2, BY, BZ) but only four equations (sum of moments in X, sum of forces in Y and Z, and an equation for pulley tensions). Suggestions include fixing the spindle position with bearings at both ends, treating the normal force as a parameter, and conducting a free body diagram (FBD) analysis of the shaft to assess stress and deflection. Additional recommendations involve considering pre-tension in the pulley system and analyzing bending moments on the shaft.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium equations in mechanics
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams (FBD) for structural analysis
  • Knowledge of torque calculations and motor selection for mechanical systems
  • Basic principles of tension and forces in pulley systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the design and analysis of bearing systems in rotating machinery
  • Study the principles of torque and motor selection for grinding applications
  • Research methods for analyzing bending moments in shafts
  • Investigate the effects of pre-tension in pulley systems and its impact on performance
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, design engineers, and anyone involved in the analysis and design of rotating machinery components, particularly those focusing on grinding machines and shaft design.

fabianv19
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, this is my first post on the forum. I am analyzing the following system: a shaft that contains a transmission pulley, a support, and a grinding wheel used for polishing tanks. I want to design the shaft and calculate the required torque to select the motor.

1740797331553.png



I have encountered some problems with the static analysis of the shaft because, according to my calculations, I have more unknowns than equations. In the attached image, I show the four equations I have formulated:
  1. Sum of moments in the X direction.
  2. Sum of forces in the Y and Z axes.
  3. An additional equation that relates the tensions in the pulleys.
1740797393092.png


This gives me a total of four equations, but I have five unknowns:
  • N (the normal force or the reaction from the workpiece).
  • T1 and T2 (the tensions in the pulley).
  • The reactions at the support. (BY and BZ)
It seems that I cannot obtain more static equations without introducing additional unknowns. To solve this, I assumed that the normal force N is equal to the force F1, which is the force applied by the operator during polishing, plus the weight of the wheel. However, I am not sure if this assumption is valid.
Could anyone help me determine if this is correct or if there is another way to solve the system? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

I believe the problem arises because the spindle position is not fixed, as it has only one spindle support bearing.

You need a bearing at each end of a practical grinder spindle.
One bearing will predominantly counter the drive belt tension, while the other will predominantly counter the contact force of the wheel against the work.
 
The operator is responsible the normal force I believe so it is a parameter, not an unknown?
 
Also, do a FBD of the shaft if you intend to analyze stress and deflection of the shaft. Just show the shaft and effective loadings on it.
 
These are just my suggestions as an amateur scientist.
The analysis is of the forces applied to the shaft only.
Eqn (3) you do not need a term for the reaction of the table to the bearing as we are considering only the shaft.
Eqn (4), friction. You do not need to consider friction provided there is no slip. I suggest you check for slip as a separate exercise and increase pre-tension if required.
I think you need a term for pre-tension, as T1-T2 = pre-tension.
Eqn (2) I think you need to include the horizontal component of force applied by the workpiece, presumably N x mu.
I think you need to numerically specify the force N applied by the workpiece.
I also notice that you do not analyse the bending moments on the shaft, Post #2 is applicable here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K