Help Proving (dy/dx)=1/(dx/dy)

  • Thread starter Thread starter danerape
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 3K views
danerape
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
How does one go about rigorously proving that (dy/dx)=1/(dx/dy)?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
and vice-versa of course
 
how can y=f(x) define y implicitly? that seems explicit.
 
the above is in regard to the link provided
 
This isn't for homework. Here is my attempt at a proof.

1.Say we are given a function y=f(x)

2.Differentiate implicit w.r.t. y and we see...

1=(df/dx)(dx/dy)

3. Now we can solve for the derivative of our choice!

Now, my question is...

doesn't the result of 2(implicit differentiation) imply that we thought of y=f(x) as y=f(x(y))? In other words,
implicit diff stems from the chain rule right? So, doesn't that mean that the proof above is not general, in other
words, what if I can't solve y=f(x) for x as a function of y explicitly? Then I can't say y=f(x) is the same as y=f(x(y))
and obtain the right side of 2 which results from the chain rule.

Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
danerape said:
...what if I can't solve y=f(x) for x as a function of y explicitly?

Have you ever heard of the inverse function theorem? I will summarize it for a function of one variable, since the formulation is a bit easier. The theorem effectively says that if you have a function [itex]f:A\subset \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex] which is differentiable and has a continuous derivative on some open set [itex]A[/itex], and [itex]f'(a)\neq 0[/itex] at some point [itex]a\in A[/itex], then [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] exists and is defined in some neighbourhood of [itex]a[/itex].

In the context of your problem, this means that as long as [itex]f[/itex] is [itex]C^1[/itex], and its derivative isn't zero one the whole domain, then SOMEWHERE in its domain, [itex]f[/itex] is invertible. Suppose that [itex]f[/itex] is invertible on [itex]U\subset A[/itex] as above. Then we have a function [itex]f^{-1} : f(U)\rightarrow A[/itex] which satisfies [itex]f^{-1}(f(x))=x[/itex] for all [itex]x \in U[/itex].

In conclusion, if [itex]f(x)=y[/itex], then so long as [itex]y[/itex] is in [itex]f(U)[/itex], we have [itex]x=f^{-1}(y)[/itex].

In short... you can always solve [itex]y=f(x)[/itex] for [itex]x[/itex] as a function of [itex]y[/itex] somewhere, as long as [itex]f[/itex] is continuously differentiable and isn't a constant function.
 
Last edited:
Well.. A neat lil trick you can do is (given f^-1=g), f(g(x))=x, derivative of bother sides is f'(g(x))*g'(x)=1, proceed from there :)
(assuming invertibility)
 
Last edited: