Help to determine the luminosity of a star

  • Thread starter Thread starter victoriafello
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Luminosity Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the luminosity of the stars 85 Peg A, B, and C using absolute and apparent magnitudes. The user initially calculated luminosities of 0.667 for A and 0.033 for B but found discrepancies when comparing with star catalogs. It is suggested that the calculations may need to use bolometric rather than visual magnitudes, and there is mention of using software like Celestia for more accurate results. The user is awaiting confirmation from their tutor about the correct equation and methodology. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges in accurately determining stellar luminosities and the importance of using reliable sources and methods.
victoriafello
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I need to work out the luminosity of 3 stars 85 PEG A / B / C using the following data and equation,

Absolute Mag of stars A/B/C/SUN
MA = 5.28
MB = 8.53
MC = 15
MS = 4.84
Apparent Mag of stars A/B/C
mA = 5.75
mB = 9.00
mC = 15.47
LS = Luminosity of Sun – 1 ?

Equation
MA-MS = -2.5 LOG ( LA/LS)

I have got a result of 0.667 for A and 0.033 for B, But when i have looked online at star catalogues the actual lumisosity is different, where am i going wrong ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
victoriafello said:
I have got a result of 0.667 for A and 0.033 for B, But when i have looked online at star catalogues the actual lumisosity is different, where am i going wrong ?

What luminosities do the catalogues give for these stars? Even better, can you give links to these catalogues?
 
I looked on a few sites at home which i can't remember now but one was on Wiki, i know that's not always the most reliable source so i wasnt sure if it was me or them that was incorrect


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/85_Pegasi
 
victoriafello said:
I looked on a few sites at home which i can't remember now but one was on Wiki, i know that's not always the most reliable source so i wasnt sure if it was me or them that was incorrect


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/85_Pegasi


I thinks that this uses bolometric, not visual, magnitudes to calculate luminosities.
 
I have been investigating the same question. I have used the same method as you but not sure if it is correct. Waiting for my tutor to get back to me whether they have told us to use the correct equation! Using the software Celestia A = 0.558 and B = 0.032 but i assume that is absolute luminosity. I will tell you if the tutor comes up with anything.
 
I have been lead to believe that my values (the same as yours for this question) have been calculated in the correct way. If you used the Celestia software, which is good fun and recommend but can't find the link at the mo, sorry, and use their figs for M then you get closer to their values for L. One bonus from going through countless pieces of paper and lots of pencil lead is that I am now quite au fait with solving log equations!
My tutor has been brillant on this matter and actually bothered to look at the question unlike the tutor on my other course when there were queries.
Good luck with the rest of the paper.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top