Help Understanding A Paper - Brachistochrone With Friction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of equation (18) in a paper about the Brachistochrone problem with friction. Participants express confusion regarding the author's use of energy conservation principles and the substitution of equations (13) and (17). The key symbols discussed include the coefficient of friction (μ), the angle (α), the constant of integration (C1), and the initial height (H) of the ball. The need for clarity in the author's steps is emphasized, as well as the potential application of a simple physics principle that may simplify the derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Knowledge of the Brachistochrone problem and its historical context
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and symbols used in physics papers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the Brachistochrone curve in the presence of friction
  • Study the application of energy conservation in dynamic systems
  • Learn about the role of constants of integration in differential equations
  • Explore methods for simplifying complex equations in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, mathematicians working on calculus applications, and anyone interested in the Brachistochrone problem and its complexities involving friction.

eddiezhang
Messages
39
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
I am currently reading this paper (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373607009_Exact_Solution_of_the_Problem_of_Brachistochrone_with_Allowance_for_the_Coulomb_Friction_Forces), where the author models the brachistochrone (least time of descent) curve for a circular ball while considering coulomb friction.

I'm confused by the penultimate step (the working behind equation 18).
Relevant Equations
.5mv^2 + mgy = mgH
Others contained in file / attached in attempt
Conservation of energy is invoked, which I understand, but the author omits most of the steps. He arrives at (18):


1727248857569.png




I've tried to substitute (13) and (17) into the LHS of the energy conservation equation, but the result is quite messy and my gut feeling is that it doesn't simplify in a nice way to achieve equation (18). For example:



Working.png



My Maths teacher has looked at this and is also confused as to how the author arrives at (18).

I realise that having to slog your way through this paper is not a trivial task, so any help or insight into how the author arrives at (18) is deeply appreciated. My gut feeling is that there is a simple physics principle applicable that I've missed from which (18) follows.

Relevant symbols used in the paper (for your convenience):
- μ is the coefficient of friction
- α is the angle formed between the unit tangent vector of the point on the curve being investigated; φ I believe is the same, but specifically as a function of time. The notation used is a little confusing.
- C1 is introduced as a constant of integration in (13)
- H is the starting height of of the ball above (0,0), i.e. the maximum y-value the ball possesses


Many thanks
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Forgot to mention: the author is Russian and I don't know how I might contact him (if necessary... or even welcome). Would anyone know how to and should I try?

Thanks.
 
Continued grinding away on it; I think I get it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
16K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K