Help understanding the definition of positive semidefinite matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter docnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of a positive semidefinite matrix, specifically in the context of a constant matrix defined by the entries \(B(t_i, t_j)\) for a finite integer \(k\). The notation \(\{t_i\}_{i=1}^k\) represents a set of time slices that are finite and ordered, with the condition \(t_1 < t_2 < ... < t_k\). The matrix formed from these entries is symmetric, as indicated by the equality \(M_{ij} = M_{ji} = \mathbb{E}[X_s X_t]\). The term 'time slice' is questioned for its precision in this mathematical context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of positive semidefinite matrices
  • Familiarity with matrix notation and operations
  • Knowledge of stochastic processes and expectations
  • Basic concepts of finite sets and ordering
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of positive semidefinite matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about the implications of symmetric matrices in statistics
  • Explore the concept of time series analysis and its applications
  • Investigate the role of covariance functions in stochastic processes
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and data scientists interested in the properties of positive semidefinite matrices and their applications in stochastic modeling and time series analysis.

docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
486
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Screenshot 2024-03-01 at 5.15.12 PM.png


Please confirm or deny the correctness of my understanding about this definition.

For a given set of ##t_i##s, the matrix ##(B(t_i,t_j))^k_{i,j=1}## is a constant ##k\times k## matrix, whose entries are given by ##B(t_i,t_j)## for each ##i## and ##j##.

The the 'finite' in the last line of the definition refers to ##t_1## and ##t_k## is finite, and ##k## is assumed to be a finite integer.

And if we impose the condition ##t_1<t_2<...<t_k## , then for all finite time slices' ##\{t_i\}_{i=1}^k## means ##\{t_1,...,t_k | (t_1<t_2<...<t_k) \text{ and } (t_i
\in \mathbb{R} \text{ for all } i \in \{1,...,k\}) \text{ and } (-\infty < t_1 < t_k < \infty)\}.##

One such ' time slice' is ##1,2,3,...k##. Another is ##-1,-,\frac{1}{2},...,-\frac{1}{k-1},-\frac{1}{k}.##


A few questions I have are, what information does ##\{t_i\}^k_{i=1}## convey? I find interpreting this notation confusing. Is 'time slice' a precise term at all?

Thank you. 🙂
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To add, if someone defines the function ##B## as ##B(s,t)=\mathbb{E}[X_sX_t]##, the matrix ##((B(i,j))_{i,j=1}^k)=M## is symmetric, i.e., ##M_{ij}=M_{ji}=\mathbb{E}[X_sX_t]= \mathbb{E}[X_tX_s].##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K