Help with a Problem Involving Eigenvalues and Exponential Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving eigenvalues and exponential functions, specifically relating to a system of differential equations represented in matrix form. The original poster attempts to solve for the eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors, leading to a general solution for the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors, questioning the setup of the matrix and the interpretation of the general solution. There is also clarification sought regarding the notation and the use of the Wronskian.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the original poster's approach and notation, with some participants suggesting a reevaluation of the general solution format. There is acknowledgment of a resolution reached by the original poster after consulting with a professor, indicating that some guidance was provided.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the notation used and the specific calculations related to the Wronskian, which may have contributed to the original poster's difficulties in obtaining the correct answer.

PBJinx
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1.\frac{dx}{dt}= \stackrel{9 -12}{2 -1}

x(0)=\stackrel{-13}{-5}


So I seem to be having issues with this problem

There are 2 eigenvalues that I obtained from setting

Det[A-rI]=0

That gave me r^{2}-8r+15=0

solving for r and finding the roots i got

(r-3)*(r-5)=0

so the roots are r_{1}=3 and r_{2}=5

putting those back into [A-rI] i obtained

r_{1}

4y-12z=0
2y-6z=0

so the vector w_{1}=\stackrel{2}{1}

for r_{2} i obtained

4y-12z=0
2y-6z=0

so w_{2}=\stackrel{3}{1}

I am now left with this equation

v(t)=[W][e^{t\Lambda}c

Where c=[W^{-1}v_{0}

that leads to finding W^{-1} where W=\stackrel{2 3}{1 1}

W^{-1}=\stackrel{-1 3}{1 -2}

c=[\stackrel{2}{3}

I put back into my equation and get

V(t)=\stackrel{4e^{3t} + 6e^{5t}}{2e^{3t}+3e^{5t}}


i put that into webwork and i get an incorrect answer

any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you mean
\begin{pmatrix} x_1' \\ x_2' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 9 & -12 \\ 1 & -2\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{pmatrix}
 
lanedance said:
do you mean
\begin{pmatrix} x_1' \\ x_2' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 9 & -12 \\ 1 & -2\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{pmatrix}

yes, sorry i am not used to using typing it out this way
 
just a little hard to work out exactly what youre doing, I'm not too sure what you did with the wronksian

isn't the general solution
\textbf{v(t)} = \textbf{w}_1 e^{3t}+ \textbf{w}_2 e^{5t}
 
lanedance said:
just a little hard to work out exactly what youre doing, I'm not too sure what you did with the wronksian

isn't the general solution
\textbf{v(t)} = \textbf{w}_1 e^{3t}+ \textbf{w}_2 e^{5t}


thank you for the help. i went to the professor today and figured it out with him.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K