Help with Cartesian to Ellipsoidal Coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the transformation of Cartesian coordinates to ellipsoidal coordinates using specific equations involving variables λ, μ, and ν. The original equations provided are complex and involve multiple variables, including a, b, and c, which represent the semi-principal axes of the ellipsoid. Participants suggest methods for simplifying the equations by multiplying and rearranging terms, ultimately leading to a clearer path for isolating the variables. The conversation highlights the importance of geometric insights in solving such algebraic transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian and ellipsoidal coordinate systems
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation and systems of equations
  • Knowledge of geometric properties of ellipsoids
  • Experience with mathematical software like Maple or Mathematica
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric properties of ellipsoids and their coordinate transformations
  • Learn advanced algebraic techniques for solving systems of equations
  • Explore the use of Maple or Mathematica for symbolic computation
  • Research scale factors and their applications in ellipsoidal coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers working with coordinate transformations and geometric modeling will benefit from this discussion.

jtleafs33
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to isolate the expressions for ellipsoidal coordinates (see below)...

I'm given:

x2=\frac{(a^2+\lambda)(a^2+\mu)(a^2+\nu)}{(a^2-b^2)(a^2-c^2)}

y2=\frac{(b^2+\lambda)(b^2+\mu)(b^2+\nu)}{(b^2-a^2)(b^2-c^2)}

z2=\frac{(c^2+\lambda)(c^2+\mu)(c^2+\nu)}{(c^2-b^2)(c^2-a^2)}

For -\lambda<c^2<-\mu<b^2<-\nu<a^2

And, I need to transform this to:

\frac{x^2}{a^2+\lambda}+\frac{y^2}{b^2+\lambda}+\frac{z^2}{c^2+\lambda}=1

\frac{x^2}{a^2+\mu}+\frac{y^2}{b^2+\mu}+\frac{z^2}{c^2+\mu}=1

\frac{x^2}{a^2+\nu}+\frac{y^2}{b^2+\nu}+\frac{z^2}{c^2+\nu}=1

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to solve the 3 equations in the first part as a system of equations to end up with 3 new equations, one each for \lambda,\mu,\nu in terms of only x,y,z,a,b,c, but this just keeps getting more and more complicated. Solving in this 'traditional' way gives me expressions that even Maple or Mathematica refuse to isolate for one variable. I think there maybe is something I'm supposed to note about the geometry or something that helps me develop the second 3 equations?. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi jtleafs33! :smile:

hint: start by multiplying both top and bottom of the first fraction by (b2 - c2) :wink:
 
Right. I didn't think of that, but I see you're trying to get me a common denominator here to simplify things.

Multiply the first equation by (b^2-c^2)
Multiply the second equation by (a^2-c^2)
Multiply the third equation by (a^2-b^2)

Rearranging, I let:

k=(a^2-b^2)(a^2-c^2)(b^2-c^2)

So now I have:

kx^2=(a^2+\lambda)(a^2+\mu)(a^2+\nu)(b^2-c^2)
ky^2=(b^2+\lambda)(b^2+\mu)(b^2+\nu)(a^2-c^2)
kz^2=(c^2+\lambda)(c^2+\mu)(c^2+\nu)(a^2-b^2)

This is still stumping me on where to go from here, I can feel this thing getting more complicated as I try to solve this system of eqns by simplifying and substituting in...
 
jtleafs33 said:
kx^2=(a^2+\lambda)(a^2+\mu)(a^2+\nu)(b^2-c^2)
ky^2=(b^2+\lambda)(b^2+\mu)(b^2+\nu)(a^2-c^2)
kz^2=(c^2+\lambda)(c^2+\mu)(c^2+\nu)(a^2-b^2)

ok, now divide both sides of the first one by a2 + λ (and so on), and then expand what's left :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
ok, now divide both sides of the first one by a2 + λ (and so on), and then expand what's left :smile:

Ok, so:

\frac{kx^2}{a^2+\lambda}=a^4b^2+a^2b^2\mu+a^2b^2\nu+b^2\mu\nu-a^4c^2-a^2c^2\mu-a^2c^2\nu-c^2\mu\nu

by "and so on" what do you mean?
If I divide the second one by (b^2+\lambda) and the third by (c^2+\lambda) i'll just have 3 rearranged expressions for \lambda, so you must mean something different?

I really appreciate your help. There is a lot more to this problem (finding scale factors, calculating divergence and curl in these coordinates) but I know how to do these things. The hiccup I'm having is finding the equations for each coordinate surface, which is what you're helping me with. It's frustrating when you already know what you're trying to show, but you can't figure out how to show it!
 
jtleafs33 said:
by "and so on" what do you mean?
If I divide the second one by (b^2+\lambda) and the third by (c^2+\lambda) i'll just have 3 rearranged expressions for \lambda …

no, you'll have 3 rearranged expressions for μ and \nu :wink:

and when you add them all, you should find that nearly everything cancels! :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
no, you'll have 3 rearranged expressions for μ and \nu :wink:

and when you add them all, you should find that nearly everything cancels! :smile:

Ahh, well at least it's been a nice algebra practice. I got it now, Thanks! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K