Help with Circular Motion Homework: Find Gravitation Force Point

AI Thread Summary
To find the point where a third object experiences no net gravitational force between two masses, A (mass m) and B (mass 4m), located 2m apart, one must analyze the gravitational forces acting on the third object. The gravitational force from mass A on the third object is given by F1 = Gm*m2/r1^2, while the force from mass B is F2 = G(4m)m2/r2^2. The distances r1 and r2 relate to the position of the third object along the line connecting A and B, where R = r1 + r2 equals 2m. Setting the forces equal (F1 - F2 = 0) allows for solving the position where the forces cancel out, resulting in no net gravitational force on the third object. Understanding these calculations is crucial for solving the homework question effectively.
Pepsi
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm having troubles with one of my homework questions, and I was wondering if someone could help me with it.

okay here it is...

Q: Two masses, object A and object B are located 2m apart from each other, the mass of object a is m and the mass of object b is 4m.

Showing your calculations find the point between these two objects where a third object would experience no gravitation force.

I'm really stuck on this question, any help would be very much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"a third object would experience no gravitation force."
what they mean is, no net gravitation force
imagine a particle C lying on the line connecting A and B - what is the force that C feels from A? what is the force that C feels from B?
What is the net force?
 
I don't understand that at all...

I would have thought I'd try and figure out what m was = to then, maybe do that... because from what I know I don't think I can figure out the net gravititional force from just what I was given...

A little more help? heh
 
Are you aware that the force for gravitation is
\vec{F}=-\frac{Gm_1m_2}{r^2}\hat{r}

You have two masses m and 4m and some unknown mass m_2, so the magnitude of the gravitational attraction between m and m_2 is
F_1=\frac{Gmm_2}{r_1^2}
where r_1 is the distance between m_2 and m. The strength of the gravitational attraction between 4m and m_2 is
F_2=\frac{G(4m)m_2}{r_2^2}
where r_2 is the distance between 4m and m_2. If m_2 lies along the line between 4m and m and the distance between m and 4m is R, then
R=r_1+r_2, so the second equation becomes
F_2=\frac{G(4m)m_2}{(R-r_1)^2}
If m_2 is right between A and B, then the forces act in opposite directions and so cancel each other out. When F_1-F_2=0, m_2 will feel no force.
 

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

Uniform circular motion and conservation of energy
Replies
22
Views
3K
B Why is speed constant when centripetal acceleration is constant?
Replies
24
Views
3K
I Direction of friction of each wheel and total moment when a car turns
Replies
6
Views
2K
Motion of particle changing forces
Replies
3
Views
1K
B Confusion while trying to build intuition of centripetal force
Replies
15
Views
3K
Work in Uniform Circular Motion
Replies
3
Views
3K
Confused in diffferent forces involved in circular motion
Replies
7
Views
7K
Connecting Newton's 3rd law of motion to circular motion
Replies
21
Views
11K
How do we provide centripetal force in this situation?
Replies
16
Views
2K
Projectile motion of a two-point rigid body
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top