Help With Expectation of Y(X) & X Following Gaussian Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter lode
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expectation
lode
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have two random variables Y and X and Y is dependent of X, though X is not the only source of variability of Y. With fixed X=x, Y(x) follows gaussian law. X also follows gaussian law.

In what cases can I move from
E[ Y(X) ]

to
E[ Y(E(X))]

someone has any idea?
is there a text You recommend on the topic?
thanks..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lode said:
I have two random variables Y and X and Y is dependent of X, though X is not the only source of variability of Y. With fixed X=x, Y(x) follows gaussian law. X also follows gaussian law.

In what cases can I move from
E[ Y(X) ]

to
E[ Y(E(X))]

someone has any idea?
is there a text You recommend on the topic?
thanks..

I think you mean E(Y|X).

Can you combine X and R where R ( for 'residual') includes all other extraneous conditions on Y? If so, then write P(X)+P(R)-P(X)P(R)=P(X') assuming X and R are independent.

Then use Bayes' Theorem:

P(Y|X')=P(X'|Y)P(Y)/P(X')

The validity if this approach assumes that P(Y|X') includes all conditions on Y.

EDIT: You could of course simply find P(Y|X) the same way, but this does not give you as good a description of the behavior of Y when you know of other conditions on Y. E(Y|X') is the value of Y|X' when P(Y|X') is maximal.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top