Help with generalized linear model

Cexy
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
I have a data set {X(t) = (x(t), y(t))}_t=1,...,N and I'm interested in modelling the changes from t to t+1, using some metric d(X(t),X(t+1))

The issue is that x(t) has some dependence on y(t), and I'd like to account for this: if there is a large change in y(t) we expect there to be a corresponding change in x(t), and I'd like the metric to account for this expected change.

The problem is that x(t) takes only discrete values (in fact it is almost always 1 or 2, with a small probability of being any other integer greater than 2) whereas y(t) is a positive real number with an unknown distribution (although of course I can approximate the distribution with a histogram - I have a lot of data available).

What would be an appropriate model for the dependence of x(t) on y(t)?

I've thought about normalizing x(t) to be in the range [0,1] and using a logistic or probit model, but I really have no idea how appropriate this is.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cexy said:
...What would be an appropriate model for the dependence of x(t) on y(t)?...

It's difficult to model a general stochastic process by data exploration alone. If anything is known about the underlying physical system, so that appropriate assumptions can be made, it will help in selecting a range of candidate models (possibly including but not limited to GLM).
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top