Help with interference question AH physics? exam tomorrow :(

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a student's confusion regarding an interference question from the 2009 Advanced Higher Physics exam, specifically related to the calculation of wavelength (λ) at 580 nm. The student seeks clarification on their answer compared to the SQA marking scheme, which indicates discrepancies in their calculations. Key advice includes taking time to ensure calculations align with the theoretical framework provided by the SQA, emphasizing the importance of understanding the relationship between wavelength and interference patterns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave interference principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of wavelength (λ)
  • Knowledge of the SQA marking scheme for Advanced Higher Physics
  • Basic skills in solving physics equations related to light and interference
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of wave interference in physics
  • Study the SQA marking schemes for past Advanced Higher Physics papers
  • Practice calculations involving wavelength and interference patterns
  • Explore resources on common mistakes in physics problem-solving
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for Advanced Higher Physics exams, particularly those struggling with wave interference concepts and calculations. This discussion is also beneficial for educators seeking to understand common student misconceptions in physics.

ah4p
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Could someone please explain this question to me I'll include what I thought the answer was and the actual SQA answers.

Please can you read my answer just to see what I'm doing wrong and what I don't understand

It's from the 2009 past paper AH physics

Thanks so much I really appreciate any help
smile.png
exam tomorrow ;(
1. Homework Statement

attachment.jpg


Homework Equations



these are gien below in my attampt and in the SQA marking scheme included below

The Attempt at a Solution


attachment.jpg
this is the answer given by sqa

attachment.jpg
thanks very very very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your 2 n t looks more like 4 n t and what you write down doesn't correspond to what you calculate.

Furthermore, you and sqa both seem to know ##\lambda##. We don't.

So: work a little less hasty, and you'll be just fine. Good luck tomorrow !
 
  • Like
Likes ah4p
BvU said:
Your 2 n t looks more like 4 n t and what you write down doesn't correspond to what you calculate.

Furthermore, you and sqa both seem to know ##\lambda##. We don't.

So: work a little less hasty, and you'll be just fine. Good luck tomorrow !
sorry λ is 580nm

thanks so much for ur reply
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K