Help with ratio 1.0 x 10-2 = 1:100

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaye77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio
kaye77
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
please could you help me understand this is very simple terms.

1.0 x 10-2 = 1:100

(as in ten to the power of minus 2)

i do not understand what i need to do to get it into a ratio.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi kaye77! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
kaye77 said:
i do not understand what i need to do to get it into a ratio.

A ratio is exactly the same as a fraction.

So 1.0 x 10-2 = 0.01 = 1/100 = 2/200 = 39.7174/3971.74,

= 1:100 = 2:200 = 39.7174:3971.74.

(Any ratio would do, but we usually, though not always choose to start with "1:")

btw, the only real advantage of the ratio terminology is that you can use it with more than two numbers, which you can't do with fractions

for example you can write x:y:z = 1:2:3 in one equation (while using fractions would take at least two equations). :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top