A Help with simplifying an integral

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the disappearance of the variable "v" in the third line of equation (1.8). Participants suggest changing variables to simplify the integral, emphasizing that "v" is constant with respect to the integration variable. However, concerns are raised about "v" potentially becoming imaginary, which could complicate the integration limits and introduce additional imaginary terms. The distinction between real and imaginary values of "z" and "v" is highlighted, suggesting that different equations may apply under these conditions. The conversation reflects a deeper inquiry into the implications of variable changes in the context of complex analysis.
TroyElliott
Messages
58
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Stuck on some algebra within an integral.
I am not seeing how the v goes away in the third equal sign of equation (1.8). It seems to be that it must be cos(z*sinh(u+v)), not cos(z*sinh(u)).
In the defined equations (1.7), the variable "v" can become imaginary, so a simple change of variables would change the integration sign by adding an imaginary term - not what occurs in (1.8). Any idea on how to get the third line of (1.8)?

Thanks for any insight!
stuck.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In order to get the third line in Eq. (1.8) change variables ##u+v\mapsto u## and ##u-v\mapsto u##.
Since ##v## is constant with respect to the integration varible ##du = d(u\pm v)##, and also don't forget that integral of an even function ##f(x)=f(-x)## leads to ##\int_{-a}^a f(x)dx= 2\int_0^a f(x)dx##.
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
MathematicalPhysicist said:
In order to get the third line in Eq. (1.8) change variables ##u+v\mapsto u## and ##u-v\mapsto u##.
Since ##v## is constant with respect to the integration varible ##du = d(u\pm v)##, and also don't forget that integral of an even function ##f(x)=f(-x)## leads to ##\int_{-a}^a f(x)dx= 2\int_0^a f(x)dx##.

But, in this case, doesn’t it matter than ##v## can potentially become an imaginary number, and the limits of the integral would no longer be just infinity? We would get an added imaginary term to the limit, e.g. ##\infty + 2\pi i##.

More explicitly, ##v= arcsinh(\frac{mc^{2}t}{hz}),## where ##z## is given in Eq.(1.7). We see that inside the light cone, ##z## becomes imaginary. So ##v## would also become imaginary, in this case. When performing the change of variables, the integration bound would now pick up an additional imaginary piece. This is what I am confused about - how can it still just be ##\infty##?
 
Last edited:
u and v are both real and v is constant as for integration of u.
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} du = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d(u+v)
or so.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
In order to get the third line in Eq. (1.8) change variables ##u+v\mapsto u## and ##u-v\mapsto u##.
Since ##v## is constant with respect to the integration varible ##du = d(u\pm v)##, and also don't forget that integral of an even function ##f(x)=f(-x)## leads to ##\int_{-a}^a f(x)dx= 2\int_0^a f(x)dx##.
anuttarasammyak said:
u and v are both real and v is constant as for integration of u.
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} du = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d(u+v)
or so.
But we see in Eq.(1.7), that inside the light cone, ##v## can become imaginary.
 
It seems that (1.8) is for real z with u and v real, and (1.9) is for imaginary z.
 
  • Like
Likes TroyElliott
TroyElliott said:
But we see in Eq.(1.7), that inside the light cone, ##v## can become imaginary.
Such a calculation is done in a course in complex analysis; I don't recall the details, sorry.
 
  • Like
Likes TroyElliott

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
512
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K