hi.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is there something wrong in using the Frobenius method for regular singular point while solving Legendre's differential equation (expanding about x=0)?

Though the solution of Legendre Differential Equation here- http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LegendreDifferentialEquation.html

uses the other form. But my book uses the Frobenius method for regular singular point..

( Forbenius method- http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FrobeniusMethod.html )

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Help with solution of legendre's diffrential equation.

Loading...

Similar Threads - Help solution legendre's | Date |
---|---|

A Need help with a differential equation | Oct 9, 2016 |

I Need help with a derivative solution | Aug 28, 2016 |

Need help understanding an aspect of undetermined coeff's | Jan 19, 2016 |

Need help interpreting the Wronskian | Jan 6, 2016 |

Can't understand solution by substitution, any help? | Feb 2, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**