Help with volume by cross section question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a volume calculation problem involving a pyramid, specifically using cross-sectional areas to set up an integral for volume. Participants are exploring how to express the side length of the pyramid's base in terms of the vertical coordinate, z, for proper integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the limits of integration and the need to express the side length 's' as a function of z. There are attempts to derive relationships using geometric principles, such as similar triangles and the Pythagorean theorem. Questions arise about how to determine the dimensions of cross-sections at various heights.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the geometric relationships within the pyramid, suggesting that the side length of the cross-section is proportional to its height from the apex. There is ongoing exploration of how to correctly set up the integral based on these relationships, but no consensus has been reached on the final method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of an attachment containing the original problem statement, which may limit the clarity of the discussion. There is also an emphasis on understanding the geometric properties of the pyramid to facilitate the integration process.

student93
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See the problem attached in this post.


Homework Equations



See the problem attached in this post.

The Attempt at a Solution



I set my limits of integration with respect to z axis and got an upper limit of 2 since that's the vertex point/height of the pyramid and my lower limit as 0 since the lowest possible point in regards to the z axis is 0. The area of a square is s^2 and I set my integrand as ∫s^2 dz, from 0 to 2 and got 8/3, which is actually the correct answer. However, this is just a coincidence since I just realized you can't take the integral of s^2 with respect to the z axis (It's necessary to convert s into some term of z). How exactly do I convert s into a term of z so that I can set up the correct integrand?
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2014-01-29 at 8.01.59 PM.png
    Screen shot 2014-01-29 at 8.01.59 PM.png
    11.1 KB · Views: 493
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I see no attachment to your post.
 
SteamKing said:
Sorry, I see no attachment to your post.

I edited the post with the problem.
 
I assume that 's' represents the length of the side of the base of the pyramid.

The calculation of 's' depends on knowing the dimensions of the base, i.e., the location of the endpoints of the sides. If you draw lines connecting the endpoints of the base with the vertex or apex of the pyramid (the tippy top point), how would you determine the dimensions of any intermediate cross-sections of the pyramid? Is there some sort of formula involving z which could be used?
 
SteamKing said:
I assume that 's' represents the length of the side of the base of the pyramid.

The calculation of 's' depends on knowing the dimensions of the base, i.e., the location of the endpoints of the sides. If you draw lines connecting the endpoints of the base with the vertex or apex of the pyramid (the tippy top point), how would you determine the dimensions of any intermediate cross-sections of the pyramid? Is there some sort of formula involving z which could be used?

You could use Pythagorean Theorem to get (1)^2 +(2)^2 = 5, thus the hypotenuse connected from the vertex to the x-axis would be √5, however I don't know where to go from there.
 
Last edited:
You're thinking from a numerical point of view. Look at the geometry of the pyramid. Let's say the length of the base side is 's' and the pyramid has a height of 'h' from the apex perpendicular to the base. What is the length of the cross-section side at z = h/2? At z = h/4? At z = 3h/4? There is a simple relationship for all of these values.
 
SteamKing said:
You're thinking from a numerical point of view. Look at the geometry of the pyramid. Let's say the length of the base side is 's' and the pyramid has a height of 'h' from the apex perpendicular to the base. What is the length of the cross-section side at z = h/2? At z = h/4? At z = 3h/4? There is a simple relationship for all of these values.

By cross section you mean a square right? So wouldn't the length of the cross section just be the same value as z? For example if z=h/2 then the length of the cross section side also equals h/2 since all four sides of a square are equal?
 
I ended up using the similar triangles theorem and ended up getting s=2-z, and solved for the integral and got 8/3 which is the correct answer. I'm assuming I used the correct method this time around?
 
The key is understanding that the length of the side of a pyramid at any altitude is proportional to the distance of the cross section from the apex of the pyramid. At the apex, s = 0 obviously, and at z = h, the length of the side s = 1 say. Then, at z = h/2, s = 1/2, and so on.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K