Help With Work Conceptualization - College Physics 1 Student

  • Thread starter Thread starter amk0713
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
Work in physics is defined as the product of force and displacement, specifically considering the direction of displacement. When force is applied at an angle, only the component of force in the direction of displacement affects the work done, which is why the equation includes the cosine of the angle. The y component of the force does not contribute to the work done in the x direction, as it does not aid in moving the object horizontally. Therefore, applying force at an angle can lead to wasted energy if it does not contribute to the desired displacement. Ultimately, work represents the transfer of energy into the object being moved.
amk0713
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi there. College Physics 1 student here, having a bit of trouble conceptualizing work, and would really appreciate a bit of help.

It makes sense to me that work is simply the product of force and distance. However, when force is applied at an angle, why do we only take into consideration the direction of displacement?

For example, if I am pulling a suitcase a distance of d in the positive x direction with a handle at angle theta the equation for work is W = Fdcos(theta). What happened to the y component of F? Furthermore, in this case does pulling an object at an angle decrease the amount of energy needed since displacing an object in the x direction with force applied at 90 degrees equals 0?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you try to shove your case into the Earth (y axis), how is that contributing to travel in the x axis? It isn't, it is creating more work for you.
 
So in that sense, work is simply the transfer of energy into the object in question? The energy used by my arms in pulling (or pushing) in the y component is separate and dependant on a different system?
 
Yes, you should concentrate on the energy placed into the object, whether F, the force, comes from your arms or an auto or anything else is not important. Force is a vector so it has components in this case in the x and y direction, you are looking only for work done pusing the case along the ground, if you wish to 'waste' some energy pushing it into the Earth that isn't what you are looking for.
 
Last edited:
Great. Thank you. :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top