Hermite Polynomial Reccurence Relation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the recurrence relation for Hermite polynomials, specifically Hn+1 = 2xHn - 2nHn-1, using Rodrigues' formula. The Rodrigues form is defined as Hn = (-1)nex²(d^n/dx^n)(e-x²). Participants explore the induction method to establish the relationship between Hk+2 and Hk+1, ultimately leading to a clearer understanding of the derivation process. The conversation highlights the importance of expressing Hermite polynomials in terms of their derivatives to complete the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermite polynomials and their properties
  • Familiarity with Rodrigues' formula for Hermite polynomials
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction techniques
  • Proficiency in differentiation and handling derivatives of exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Hermite polynomials in mathematical physics
  • Learn advanced techniques in mathematical induction for proving polynomial identities
  • Explore the relationship between Hermite polynomials and other orthogonal polynomials
  • Investigate the role of Rodrigues' formula in deriving properties of special functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in advanced polynomial theory and its applications in differential equations and quantum mechanics.

Scootertaj
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove, using Rodrigues form, that Hn+1=2xHn -2nHn-1

Homework Equations


The Rodrigues form for Hermite polynomials is the following:

Hn = (-1)nex2\frac{d^n}{dx^n}(e-x2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Hn+1 = (-1)n+1ex2\frac{d^(n+1)}{dx^(n+1)}(e-x2)
where \frac{d^(n+1)}{dx^(n+1)}(e-x2) means the (n+1)th derivative of e-x2
2xHn = 2x*(-1)nex2\frac{d^n}{dx^n}(e-x2)
2nHn-1 = 2n*(-1)n-1ex2\frac{d^(n-1)}{dx^(n-1)}(e-x2)
So, Hn+1 - 2xHn + 2nHn-1 should be = 0.
Well,

Hn+1 - 2xHn + 2nHn-1 = (-1)n-1ex2 * [ \frac{d^(n+1)}{dx^(n+1)}(e-x2) + 2x * \frac{d^n}{dx^n}(e-x2) + 2n * \frac{d^(n-1)}{dx^(n-1)}(e-x2) ]

but, I don't really know where to go from there.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I were you, I would try induction...
 
susskind_leon said:
If I were you, I would try induction...
I've tried, but it doesn't seem to get me anywhere.

Base case n=1: H1+1 = 2xH1 - 2(1)H0 ?
Yep since H2 = 4x2-2 = 2x(2x) - 2

Assume Hk+1 = 2xHk - 2kHk-1
Try to prove Hk+2 = 2xHk+1 - 2(k+1)HkWell, we know Hk+2 = (-1)k+2ex2(dk+2/dxk+2)[e-x2]

So, does Hk+2 = 2xHk+1 - 2(k+1)Hk = (-1)k+2ex2(dk+2/dxk+2)[e-x2] ?
Well, 2xHk+1 - 2(k+1)Hk = 2x(2xHk - 2kHk-1) - 2(k+1)Hk = 4x2Hk - 4xkHk-1 - 2kHk - 2Hk

I don't see how I finish it.
 
Try to express H_{k+2} in terms of H_{k+1}, without using any of the assumption. What do you need to do to get from H_{k+1} to H_{k+2}?
 
That's what I've been trying to figure out, what the relationship is between Hk+2 and Hk+1 using only Rodrigues form.
The main thing I can see is that Hk+2 * (n+1)th derivative of e-x2 = -Hk+1 * (n+2)nd derivative of e-x2

I'm sadly lost :(
 
How about H_{n+1}=- e^{x^2} \frac{d}{dx}[e^{-x^2}H_n]
Can you use this relation to make the induction step?
 
Ahh I got it I think, thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K