Hertzian Static Contact Stress Acceptance Criteria

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the acceptance criteria for Hertzian static contact stress, specifically addressing a calculated stress of 670 N/mm² using formulas from "Mechanical Engineering Design" by Shigley, 5th Edition. The participant seeks justification for using a pass criterion of 2.5 times the yield strength of Grade 5 Structural Steel (yield ~355 N/mm²). A reference from "Mechanics of Materials" by E.J. Hearn indicates that uncontained plastic flow begins at a contact stress of approximately 2.8 times the yield strength. The conversation highlights the importance of considering material ductility and service factors when evaluating contact stresses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hertzian contact stress calculations
  • Familiarity with yield strength concepts in materials science
  • Knowledge of Tresca's criterion for shear stress evaluation
  • Basic principles of material ductility and plastic flow
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Hertzian contact stress calculations" for practical applications
  • Study "Mechanics of Materials, 2nd Edition" by E.J. Hearn for detailed insights on plastic flow
  • Explore the use of "Tresca's criterion" in evaluating shear stress in ductile materials
  • Investigate the impact of surface roughness on contact stress outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, materials scientists, and professionals involved in structural design and analysis of contact stresses in engineering applications.

crobb
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have calculated a static contact stress of 670 N/mm2 using formula from Mechanical Engineering Design, Shigley, 5th Edition.

My problems lies that there is no acceptance criteria. I'm using Grade 5 Structural Steel (yield~355 N/mm2).

Previous threads have stated that a 2.5 * yield can be used for pass criteria but i can't this referenced in any code or book.

Can anyone provide a reference or justification for 2.5 * yield?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have now found a reference for this value:

Mechanics of Materials, 2nd Edition, E.J. Hearn. page 779 states 'uncontained plastic flow' commences when contact stress --> yield * 2.8
 
Hello crobb and welcome to Physics Forums.

Yes grade5 structural steel is sufficiently ductile for this approach to work.

High strength more brittle steels (and other materials) need more careful consideration - the outcome depends upon service factors such as grit or corrosion in rollers initiating a crack.

Post again if you want more.
 
crobb said:
I have now found a reference for this value:

Mechanics of Materials, 2nd Edition, E.J. Hearn. page 779 states 'uncontained plastic flow' commences when contact stress --> yield * 2.8

Usually, Hertz contact stresses are judged by the shear stress just below the surface. It will be ~211 N/mm2 in your case. Using Tresca's criterion, a minimum yield stress of ~422 N/mm2 will be required (for ductile materials). But yes, in static cases you can often allow for higher stress.

Note that surface roughness can drastically reduce the stresses.

You can use my freeware program to quickly calculate the Hertzian stresses at http://en.vinksda.nl under 'Toolkit'.

Jaap
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K