Hi all,Let λ>0 and define an equivalence relation on

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on defining an equivalence relation on ℝn-{0} using a positive scalar λ and exploring the resulting quotient space ℝn-{0}/~. The user, J, identifies equivalence classes for n=1, noting that elements in the intervals (1, λ] and (λi, λi+1] can be represented by a single class. J seeks clarification on specifying equivalence classes for the remaining elements of ℝ-{0} and aims to demonstrate that the quotient space is homeomorphic to S1 x Sn-1. The conversation highlights the relationship between equivalence classes and their representatives across different intervals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of equivalence relations in mathematics.
  • Familiarity with quotient spaces in topology.
  • Knowledge of homeomorphism concepts.
  • Basic understanding of real numbers and intervals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of quotient spaces in topology.
  • Study the concept of homeomorphism and its applications.
  • Explore equivalence relations and their implications in mathematical analysis.
  • Investigate the structure of S1 x Sn-1 and its significance in topology.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of equivalence relations and quotient spaces.

Jooolz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Let λ>0 and define an equivalence relation on ℝn-{0} by

(x~y) \Leftrightarrow (there is an s\inZ such that λsx=y)

I would like to know what the quotient space ℝn-{0}/~ looks like. I know that it is a set of equivalence classes.

To understand it better I wanted to see how it works for n=1. In that case I found that for all a\in (1, λ] there is an equivalence class [a]. And for b\in (λ, λ2] we have b=rλ where 1< r ≤ λ. But this means that b~r. So b\in[r] and we know that r\in (1, λ]. The same idea holds for elements from the intervals (λi, λi+1]. Hence every element from (1, ∞) will be in an equivalence class which has a representative in (1, λ]. Am I seeing this correct?

But how can I specify the equivalence classes of the rest of the elements of ℝ-{0}? (since λ > 1)

The goal is, (eventually) to show that the quotientspace ℝn-{0}/~ is homeomorphic to S1 x Sn-1.

I would really appreciate any help or hints, to make me understand better what they mean by quotientspace.

Kind regards,
J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


For elements in ]0,1[, you can show that such elements are also equivalent to an element in [1,\lambda[

For elements in ]-\infty,0[, you can show it equivalent to something in ]-\lambda,-1].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K