Hi, I am currently doing a project to design a lamp and am really

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a lamp, focusing on achieving a balanced structure using principles of physics. Participants explore various aspects of weight distribution, pivot points, and material choices in relation to the lamp's stability and functionality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether the weights can be adjusted in ratio while maintaining balance, suggesting that halving the weights could be an option.
  • Another participant notes that the design assumes the weight of the arms is negligible compared to the weights, emphasizing the importance of material choice for the arms.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of keeping pivot points fixed for balance, with some uncertainty expressed regarding alternative configurations.
  • Questions arise about measuring to the center of mass of the weights versus their dimensions, with a suggestion that the center of mass should be the reference point for measurements.
  • A later reply raises concerns about the center of gravity being above the pivot points and questions whether a heavier base could resolve stability issues.
  • Another participant wonders if using rods made from different materials, which would have varying masses, would affect the balance, or if only the distances between weights are significant.
  • There is a mention of sourcing joints with minimal friction, indicating a practical concern in the design process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the design considerations, with no clear consensus on the best approach to achieving balance or the implications of using different materials for the lamp's structure.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the negligible weight of the arms, the need for precise measurements to the center of mass, and the potential impact of different materials on balance. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in lamp design, physics applications in engineering, or those exploring concepts of balance and stability in mechanical systems may find this discussion relevant.

Jamesbenham
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am currently doing a project to design a lamp and am really interested in using physics to gain a perfectly balanced design. I have come across this diagram...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a7/Lamp_2_counter_weight.PNG

I just want to clarify a couple of things before I go ahead and produce it! Apologies if these are stupid questions but it is a while since I did any physics.

1. I can turn these into any numbers as long as the ratio says the same right? E.g. Half the weights.

2. The the pivot points need to remain exactly there in order to balance or does another option exist? By this I mean the lamp head is moveable in almost any direction, but with the layout of the arms in a different way?

3. The measurements on the diagram (10,20 etc.) seem to show the measurement to the centre point of the weights... Is this what I need to measure to (the centre of mass of the weight?) or can the weights differ in dimension as long as the mass remains the same?

4. Imagine a curtain pole (the arm) with a screw (the weight) half screwed into the end... Where would I measure 10,20 lengths to? The end of the pole or up to the start of the screw?

Thank you so much for this.

James.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


The design assumes the weight of the arms is negligible compared to the weights.

The 200 and 100 lamp works like this : 200 x 10 = 20 x 100 , for it to balance at the pivot. You may want to have a way to move the 200 weight on the arm a bit in or out to get a horizontal balance.

Same thing for the 600 weight, so that when the top arm is pointing into/outof the page the second arm will balance horizontally. ie 300 x 20 = 600 x 10

So
question 1 - as long as the weight of the arm is much lighter than the weights, so choose appropriate material for the arms.

question 2 - not really sure what you are asking

question 3 - center of mass of the weight to the pivot

Question 4 - a heavy screw, much heavier than the curtain pole, measure to the centre of mass of the screw.

You will have to make some small adjustments, as I said previously, to the lengths or weights for the thing to operate as in the picture.
 


Thank you so much that is brilliant. Thank you also to to the other replier who doesn't appear to be showing up. I really appreciate it.
 


Hopefully it works out and the thing is stable, as the centre of gravity is not being below the pivot points .
 


256- will a heavy base just sort this issue?

If the lengths of rod were made from different materials and therefore had a different mass would this be an issue or is it just the distance between the weights that matters?

just need to source a place to buy joints with as little friction as possible!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K