Hi - What is perpetual motion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of perpetual motion, exploring whether such machines can exist, particularly in the context of space. Participants examine the implications of physical laws, such as Newton's laws of motion and the laws of thermodynamics, on the feasibility of perpetual motion machines.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define perpetual motion as machines that operate indefinitely without energy input, noting that no such machine has ever been successfully built.
  • It is suggested that while motion can continue in space without external forces, a machine that does work and operates itself is not possible due to the influence of external forces.
  • One participant mentions superconducting currents as a near example of perpetual motion, although it requires energy to maintain the necessary conditions.
  • Another participant argues that gravity, even at a distance, affects motion, thus challenging the idea of perpetual motion in space.
  • The laws of thermodynamics are cited as prohibiting perpetual motion, with references to "frictional taxes" on Earth and "gravitational taxes" in space.
  • Some participants propose that atoms or celestial bodies like Earth and stars could be considered examples of perpetual motion, though this is contested based on the requirement of isolation from external interactions.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the influence of gravity on motion, indicating that even in space, objects are subject to gravitational forces that affect their motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that true perpetual motion machines cannot exist due to physical laws, but there are competing views on specific examples and interpretations of motion in space. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these laws on the concept of perpetual motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the discussion involves complex interactions of forces and the definitions of motion, which may depend on specific conditions and assumptions about isolation and external influences.

Touchme
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
What is perpetual motion? Will it work in space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The term "perpetual motion" is usually used to refer to a class of imaginary machines that are supposed to operate perpetually without any imput of energy: no fuel. As concieved of by misguided inventors, the point is always to get the machine to both 1.) do some kind of useful work, and 2.) also do the work of operating itself.

It is very easy to think such a machine up, and even draw a design on paper, but none of them has ever worked when some physical version of the machine was actually built. A beginning level course in physics is all it takes to gain enough understanding to realize that such a thing is just not physically possible.

The notion of continuing, non-stop motion is quite a bit different and does, in fact, exist. If you put something into motion it will stay in motion unless something interacts with it to stop it. This is clearly evident in space. Here on Earth the forces of gravity and friction are constantly exerted on everything and work to eventually stop any motion that gets started.

Newton's first law is: "A body in motion or at rest will tend to stay in motion or at rest, unless acted on by an outside force." Here on Earth that "outside force" is everywhere and nothing stays in motion for very long.

In space things will stay in motion forever unless they hit something else.

Even in space, though, there is no possibility of a machine that can do work and also operate itself. As soon as you make it interact with something to do work on it you have subjected it to that "outside force" which will bring it to a halt.
 
Excellent response, Zoob. I'll just add that here on Earth, the closest thing to perpetual motion would probably be the current in a superconductor ring. Even then, though, a lot of energy must be expended to keep the temperature in the superconduction range.
 
Danger said:
Excellent response, Zoob.
Thank you, sir.
 
A perpetual motion machine won't work in space. No matter how far you get away form a Mass gravity will always effect it(but the strength decreases) the machine and eventually you'll probably encounter another mass. So it will slow down but it will keep moving.
 
The laws of thermodynamics forbid motion [at least above quantum scales] without paying taxes. On earth, objects in motion pay frictional taxes. In space, objects in motion pay gravitational taxes [e.g., binary neutron star systems].
 
Chronos said:
The laws of thermodynamics forbid motion [at least above quantum scales] without paying taxes. On earth, objects in motion pay frictional taxes. In space, objects in motion pay gravitational taxes [e.g., binary neutron star systems].
And just what is the government doing with all our tax calories?
 
Securing oil supplies last time I checked.
 
Isn't every atom in the universe a perfect example of perpetual motion?
 
  • #10
And how about the Earth moving through space? Or the stars, et cetera.
 
  • #11
jeryst said:
Isn't every atom in the universe a perfect example of perpetual motion?

Not quite, like any other perpetual "machine", it would have to never come into contact with another atom (or interact at all).
 
  • #12
KingNothing said:
Not quite, like any other perpetual "machine", it would have to never come into contact with another atom (or interact at all).

I'm not sure I understand your response.
 
  • #13
Farsight said:
And how about the Earth moving through space? Or the stars, et cetera.
These cases are covered in Chronos' answer:

Chronos said:
The laws of thermodynamics forbid motion [at least above quantum scales] without paying taxes. On earth, objects in motion pay frictional taxes. In space, objects in motion pay gravitational taxes [e.g., binary neutron star systems].

Which I take to mean that anything moving where it is influenced by the gravitation field of anything else is being acted on by an outside force and experiences a corresponding change in its state of motion.

This means that what I said in my first post:

zoobyshoe said:
The notion of continuing, non-stop motion is quite a bit different and does, in fact, exist. If you put something into motion it will stay in motion unless something interacts with it to stop it. This is clearly evident in space. Here on Earth the forces of gravity and friction are constantly exerted on everything and work to eventually stop any motion that gets started.

is not, strictly speaking, true, since gravity extends throughout space, however much attenuated by distance, and would have some tiny effect of anything, no matter how far it it from anything else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K