High-energy neutrinos from IceCube

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcrowell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    neutrinos
bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
6,723
Reaction score
431
http://arxiv-web3.library.cornell.edu/abs/1311.5238

"Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector"

We report on results of an all-sky search for high-energy neutrino events interacting within the IceCube neutrino detector conducted between May 2010 and May 2012. The search follows up on the previous detection of two PeV neutrino events, with improved sensitivity and extended energy coverage down to approximately 30 TeV. Twenty-six additional events were observed, substantially more than expected from atmospheric backgrounds. Combined, both searches reject a purely atmospheric origin for the twenty-eight events at the 4σ level. These twenty-eight events, which include the highest energy neutrinos ever observed, have flavors, directions, and energies inconsistent with those expected from the atmospheric muon and neutrino backgrounds. These properties are, however, consistent with generic predictions for an additional component of extraterrestrial origin.

Judging from newspaper accounts, a lot of physicists seem very excited by this paper. Can anyone offer any further insight? Are the present results hard to explain theoretically? Are there specific questions that can be answered by IceCube?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There was some discussion earlier in this thread. I will have to look at the present paper to see if there's any evidence for deviation from the expected known-physics background for extraterrestrial neutrinos that was discussed in that thread.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top