High Jumpers: Advantage of Jumping Technique

  • Thread starter Thread starter zak8000
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
High jumpers utilize a technique that allows their center of mass to pass beneath the bar while their body clears it, providing a significant advantage. This method involves maximizing the height of the center of mass during the jump, followed by maneuvering the body in an upside-down "U" shape. By doing so, they can achieve greater heights without needing to lift every part of their body over the bar simultaneously. This technique optimizes both energy expenditure and jump efficiency. Understanding this strategy is crucial for improving high jump performance.
zak8000
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
i was just reading through a textbook when i came across this question.high jumpers can go over a bar in such a way that their center of mass goes under the bar even though every part of a jumpers body must go over the bar. why is this an advantage for a high jumper to jump this way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would phrase it like this: first, they jump so as to lift their center of mass as high as they possibly can, then they move their body such that each part of their body successively goes over their center of mass (upside-down "U").
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top