Higher Chance to get Lightning Strike by Large Power Consumption?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a tall building with high electricity consumption is more likely to be struck by lightning compared to a similar building with lower consumption. The consensus is that electricity consumption does not increase the likelihood of a lightning strike. Both buildings are equipped with lightning conductors and proper earthing, which mitigate the risk. Additionally, the internal wiring is insulated, and the currents flowing through the cables are designed to cancel each other out, preventing the generation of large magnetic fields that could attract lightning.
physicsdick
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Assume there are two tall building with same height, and the materials are the same, having same distance away from the storm cloud.

Will the one building with extreme high consumption of electricity cause higher chance to get struck by lightning than the one building without ?

Thanks!
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

physicsdick said:
Will the one building with extreme high consumption of electricity cause higher chance to get struck by lightning than the one building without ?
No.
Both buildings will have lightning conductors and be earthed. The internal wiring is insulated.
The high currents that flow in cables are designed to be equal and opposite, so they cancel. Large magnetic fields are not generated by cables within the structure.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, physicsdick, russ_watters and 3 others
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top