Higher Chance to get Lightning Strike by Large Power Consumption?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a tall building with high electricity consumption is more likely to be struck by lightning compared to a similar building with lower consumption. The consensus is that electricity consumption does not increase the likelihood of a lightning strike. Both buildings are equipped with lightning conductors and proper earthing, which mitigate the risk. Additionally, the internal wiring is insulated, and the currents flowing through the cables are designed to cancel each other out, preventing the generation of large magnetic fields that could attract lightning.
physicsdick
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Assume there are two tall building with same height, and the materials are the same, having same distance away from the storm cloud.

Will the one building with extreme high consumption of electricity cause higher chance to get struck by lightning than the one building without ?

Thanks!
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

physicsdick said:
Will the one building with extreme high consumption of electricity cause higher chance to get struck by lightning than the one building without ?
No.
Both buildings will have lightning conductors and be earthed. The internal wiring is insulated.
The high currents that flow in cables are designed to be equal and opposite, so they cancel. Large magnetic fields are not generated by cables within the structure.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, physicsdick, russ_watters and 3 others
M 7.6 - Drake Passage 2025-10-10 20:29:20 (UTC) 60.196°S 61.799°W 8.8 km depth https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000rgf4/executive A relatively shallow earthquake. Aftershocks have occurred. M 7.4 - 20 km E of Santiago, Philippines 2025-10-10 01:43:59 (UTC) 7.265°N 126.755°E 58.1 km depth https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000rfwz/executive M 6.7 - 23 km ESE of Santiago, Philippines 2025-10-10 11:12:07 (UTC) 7.172°N 126.755°E 61.2 km depth...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top